Estimating interrater agreement with the average deviation index: A user's guide

被引:320
作者
Burke, MJ [1 ]
Dunlap, WP
机构
[1] Tulane Univ, Freeman Sch Business, New Orleans, LA 70118 USA
[2] Tulane Univ, Dept Psychol, New Orleans, LA 70118 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1177/1094428102005002002
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
The authors present guidelines for establishing a useful range for interrater agreement and a cutoff for acceptable interrater agreement when using Burke, Finkelstein, and Dusig's average deviation (AD) index as well as critical values for tests of statistical significance with the AD index. Under the assumption that judges respond randomly to an item or set of items in a measure, the authors show that a criterion for acceptable interrater agreement or practical significance when using the AD index can be approximated as c/6, where c is the number of response options for a Likert-type item. The resulting values of 0.8, 1.2, 1.5, and 1.8 are discussed as standards for acceptable interrater agreement when using the AD index with 5-, 7-, 9-, and 11-point items, respectively. Using similar logic, the AD agreement index and interpretive standard are generalized to the case of a response scale that involves percentages or proportions, rather than discrete categories, or at the other extreme, the assessment of interrater agreement with respect to the rating of a single target on a dichotomous item (e.g., yes-no, agree-disagree, true-false item formats). Finally, the usefulness of these guidelines for judging acceptable levels of interrater agreement with respect to the metric (or units) of the original response scale is discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:159 / 172
页数:14
相关论文
共 18 条
  • [1] Borucki CC, 1999, J ORGAN BEHAV, V20, P943, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1379(199911)20:6<943::AID-JOB976>3.0.CO
  • [2] 2-9
  • [3] On Average Deviation Indices for Estimating Interrater Agreement
    Burke, Michael J.
    Finkelstein, Lisa M.
    Dusig, Michelle S.
    [J]. ORGANIZATIONAL RESEARCH METHODS, 1999, 2 (01) : 49 - 68
  • [4] RELATIONS BETWEEN WORK GROUP CHARACTERISTICS AND EFFECTIVENESS - IMPLICATIONS FOR DESIGNING EFFECTIVE WORK GROUPS
    CAMPION, MA
    MEDSKER, GJ
    HIGGS, AC
    [J]. PERSONNEL PSYCHOLOGY, 1993, 46 (04) : 823 - 850
  • [5] Cascio W.F., 1998, APPL PSYCHOL HUMAN R, V5th
  • [6] Cronbach L.J., 1960, ESSENTIALS PSYCHOL T, V2nd
  • [7] EDGINGTON ES, 1980, RANDOMIZATION TESTS
  • [8] PERSONALITY, AFFECT, AND BEHAVIOR IN GROUPS
    GEORGE, JM
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 1990, 75 (02) : 107 - 116
  • [9] SUPERIORS EVALUATIONS AND SUBORDINATES PERCEPTIONS OF TRANSFORMATIONAL AND TRANSACTIONAL LEADERSHIP
    HATER, JJ
    BASS, BM
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 1988, 73 (04) : 695 - 702
  • [10] R(WG) - AN ASSESSMENT OF WITHIN-GROUP INTERRATER AGREEMENT
    JAMES, LR
    DEMAREE, RG
    WOLF, G
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 1993, 78 (02) : 306 - 309