Ongoing EEG phase as a trial-by-trial predictor of perceptual and attentional variability

被引:220
作者
VanRullen, R. [1 ,2 ]
Busch, N. A. [3 ,4 ]
Drewes, J. [1 ,2 ]
Dubois, Julien [1 ,2 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Toulouse 3, Univ Toulouse, Ctr Rech Cerveau & Cognit, F-31062 Toulouse, France
[2] Fac Med Rangueil, UMR 5549, CNRS, Toulouse, France
[3] Charite, Inst Med Psychol, D-13353 Berlin, Germany
[4] Humboldt Univ, Berlin Sch Mind & Brain, D-10099 Berlin, Germany
[5] CALTECH, Div Biol, Pasadena, CA 91125 USA
来源
FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY | 2011年 / 2卷
关键词
EEG; oscillation; phase; pre-stimulus; spontaneous; ongoing; perception; attention; FRONTAL EYE FIELD; VISUAL WORKING-MEMORY; WAGON-WHEEL ILLUSION; MEMBRANE-POTENTIAL FLUCTUATIONS; ILLUSORY MOTION REVERSAL; SHORT REACTION-TIMES; SHORT-TERM-MEMORY; SPATIAL ATTENTION; NEURONAL OSCILLATIONS; THETA OSCILLATIONS;
D O I
10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00060
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Even in well-controlled laboratory environments, apparently identical repetitions of an experimental trial can give rise to highly variable perceptual outcomes and behavioral responses. This variability is generally discarded as a reflection of intrinsic noise in neuronal systems. However, part of this variability may be accounted for by trial-by-trial fluctuations of the phase of ongoing oscillations at the moment of stimulus presentation. For example, the phase of an electro-encephalogram (EEG) oscillation reflecting the rapid waxing and waning of sustained attention can predict the perception of a subsequent visual stimulus at threshold. Similar ongoing periodicities account for a portion of the trial-by-trial variability of visual reaction times. We review the available experimental evidence linking ongoing EEG phase to perceptual and attentional variability, and the corresponding methodology. We propose future tests of this relation, and discuss the theoretical implications for understanding the neuronal dynamics of sensory perception.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 100 条
[51]   Entrainment of neuronal oscillations as a mechanism of attentional selection [J].
Lakatos, Peter ;
Karmos, George ;
Mehta, Ashesh D. ;
Ulbert, Istvan ;
Schroeder, Charles E. .
SCIENCE, 2008, 320 (5872) :110-113
[52]   The Leading Sense: Supramodal Control of Neurophysiological Context by Attention [J].
Lakatos, Peter ;
O'Connell, Monica N. ;
Barczak, Annamaria ;
Mills, Aimee ;
Javitt, Daniel C. ;
Schroeder, Charles E. .
NEURON, 2009, 64 (03) :419-430
[53]   RELATION OF BRAIN AND TREMOR RHYTHMS TO VISUAL REACTION TIME [J].
LANSING, RW .
ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY AND CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1957, 9 (03) :497-504
[54]   The dynamics of attending: How people track time-varying events [J].
Large, EW ;
Jones, MR .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1999, 106 (01) :119-159
[55]   STATISTICAL ANALYSIS OF MEMBRANE POTENTIAL FLUCTUATIONS - RELATION WITH PRESYNAPTIC SPIKE TRAIN [J].
LEVITAN, H ;
SEGUNDO, JP ;
MOORE, GP ;
PERKEL, DH .
BIOPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 1968, 8 (11) :1256-&
[56]   STORAGE OF 7+/-2 SHORT-TERM MEMORIES IN OSCILLATORY SUBCYCLES [J].
LISMAN, JE ;
IDIART, MAP .
SCIENCE, 1995, 267 (5203) :1512-1515
[57]   The capacity of visual working memory for features and conjunctions [J].
Luck, SJ ;
Vogel, EK .
NATURE, 1997, 390 (6657) :279-281
[58]   Rescuing stimuli from invisibility: Inducing a momentary release from visual masking with pre-target entrainment [J].
Mathewson, Kyle E. ;
Fabiani, Monica ;
Gratton, Gabriele ;
Beck, Diane M. ;
Lleras, Alejandro .
COGNITION, 2010, 115 (01) :186-191
[59]   To See or Not to See: Prestimulus α Phase Predicts Visual Awareness [J].
Mathewson, Kyle E. ;
Gratton, Gabriele ;
Fabiani, Monica ;
Beck, Diane M. ;
Ro, Tony .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2009, 29 (09) :2725-2732
[60]   Phase-of-firing visual stimuli in coding of natural primary visual cortex [J].
Montemurro, Marcelo A. ;
Rasch, Malte J. ;
Murayama, Yusuke ;
Logothetis, Nikos K. ;
Panzeri, Stefano .
CURRENT BIOLOGY, 2008, 18 (05) :375-380