Prophylaxis of contrast material-induced nephropathy in patients in intensive care: Acetylcysteine, theophylline, or both? A Randomized study

被引:60
作者
Huber, Wolfgang [1 ]
Eckel, Florian
Hennig, Michael
Rosenbrock, Hilkea
Wacker, Annette
Saur, Dieter
Sennefelder, Angelika
Hennico, Romain
Schenk, Cordula
Meining, Alexander
Schmelz, Renate
Fritsch, Ralph
Weiss, Wolfgang
Hamar, Peter
Heemann, Uwe
Schmid, Roland M.
机构
[1] Univ Tubingen, Med Klin 2, Kinerkardiol Klin, Tubingen, Germany
[2] Univ Tubingen, Inst Med Stat & Epidemiol, Kinerkardiol Klin, Tubingen, Germany
[3] Univ Tubingen, Inst Klin Chem, Kinerkardiol Klin, Tubingen, Germany
[4] Tech Univ Munich, Dept Radiol, Klinikum Rechts Isar, D-81675 Munich, Germany
[5] Semmelweis Univ, Inst Pathophysiol, H-1085 Budapest, Hungary
关键词
D O I
10.1148/radiol.2393041456
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: To prospectively compare the protective effect of acetylcysteine, theophylline, and both agents combined in patients who are admitted to the intensive care unit with at least one risk factor for contrast material-induced nephropathy and who receive at least 100 mL of iodinated contrast medium. Materials and Methods: Institutional ethics review board approval and informed consent were obtained. A total of 91 patients (mean age, 58.5 years +/- 14.8 [standard deviation]; 31 women, 60 men; 150 examinations) were admitted to the intensive care unit with at least one risk factor for contrast-induced nephropathy and received either (a) 200 mg theophylline 30 minutes before contrast medium administration (group T), (b) 600 mg acetylcysteine twice daily on the day of and (if possible) the day before the examination (group A), or (c) both agents combined (group AT). The primary end-point for this study was the incidence of contrast-induced nephropathy (x(2) test). Results: Groups T, A, and AT were comparable with regard to baseline creatinine levels and the amount of contrast medium administered. The incidence of contrast-induced nephropathy in groups T, A, and AT was 2%, 12%, and 4%, respectively, and was significantly lower in group T than in group A (P=.047). There was no significant difference in the incidence of contrast-induced nephropathy between groups A and AT (P=.148) or between groups T and AT (P=.53). For group A, serum creatinine did not change after 12, 24, or 48 hours compared with baseline. Creatinine levels in group T decreased 12 hours (1.19 mg/dL +/- 0.58; P=.008) and 48 hours (1.16 mg/dL +/- 0.55; P=.034) after contrast material injection compared with baseline (1.25 mg/dL +/- 0.61). In group AT, creatinine significantly decreased 24 hours (1.21 mg/dL +/- 0.74; P=.003) and 48 hours (1.17 mg/dL +/- 0.69; P=.001) after contrast material injection compared with baseline (1.28 mg/dL +/- 0.74). Group A had significantly higher maximal increases in creatinine than groups T and AT (P <.014). Conclusion: For prophylaxis of contrast-induced nephropathy in patients who are admitted to the intensive care unit and who receive 100 mL or more of contrast medium, theophylline is superior to acetylcysteine. (c) RSNA, 2006
引用
收藏
页码:793 / 804
页数:12
相关论文
共 48 条
[1]   Effects of dopamine and aminophylline on contrast-induced acute renal failure after coronary angioplasty in patients with preexisting renal insufficiency [J].
Abizaid, AS ;
Clark, CE ;
Mintz, GS ;
Dosa, S ;
Popma, JJ ;
Pichard, D ;
Satler, LF ;
Harvey, M ;
Kent, KM ;
Leon, MB .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 1999, 83 (02) :260-+
[2]   Prospective randomized study of N-acetylcysteine, fenoldopam, and saline for prevention of radiocontrast-induced nephropathy [J].
Allaqaband, S ;
Tumuluri, R ;
Malik, AM ;
Gupta, A ;
Volkert, P ;
Shalev, Y ;
Bajwa, TK .
CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2002, 57 (03) :279-283
[3]   Role of adenosine in the renal responses to contrast medium [J].
Arakawa, K ;
Suzuki, H ;
Naitoh, M ;
Matsumoto, A ;
Hayashi, K ;
Matsuda, H ;
Ichihara, A ;
Kubota, E ;
Saruta, T .
KIDNEY INTERNATIONAL, 1996, 49 (05) :1199-1206
[4]  
Azmus Alexandre D, 2005, J Invasive Cardiol, V17, P80
[5]   A rapid protocol for the prevention of contrast - Induced renal dysfunction: the RAPPID study [J].
Baker, CSR ;
Wragg, A ;
Kumar, S ;
De Palma, R ;
Baker, LRI ;
Knight, CJ .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2003, 41 (12) :2114-2118
[6]   RADIOCONTRAST MEDIUM-INDUCED DECLINES IN RENAL-FUNCTION - A ROLE FOR OXYGEN FREE-RADICALS [J].
BAKRIS, GL ;
LASS, N ;
GABER, AO ;
JONES, JD ;
BURNETT, JC .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY, 1990, 258 (01) :F115-F120
[7]   Oxidant mechanisms in toxic acute renal failure [J].
Baliga, R ;
Ueda, N ;
Walker, PD ;
Shah, SV .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF KIDNEY DISEASES, 1997, 29 (03) :465-477
[8]   PREVENTION OF NEPHROTOXICITY INDUCED BY RADIOCONTRAST AGENTS [J].
BARRETT, BJ ;
PARFREY, PS .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1994, 331 (21) :1449-1450
[9]   Oral acetylcysteine does not protect renal function from moderate to high doses of intravenous radiographic contrast [J].
Boccalandro, F ;
Amhad, M ;
Smalling, RW ;
Sdringola, S .
CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2003, 58 (03) :336-341
[10]   Acetylcysteine and contrast agent-associated nephrotoxicity [J].
Briguori, C ;
Manganelli, F ;
Scarpato, P ;
Elia, PP ;
Golia, B ;
Riviezzo, G ;
Lepore, S ;
Librera, M ;
Villari, B ;
Colombo, A ;
Ricciardelli, B .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2002, 40 (02) :298-303