Single-Port Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy

被引:183
作者
Kaouk, Jihad H. [1 ]
Goel, Raj K. [1 ]
Haber, George-Pascal [1 ]
Crouzet, Sebastien [1 ]
Desai, Mihir M. [1 ]
Gill, Inderbir S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Cleveland Clin, Glickman Urol & Kidney Inst, Sect Laparoscop & Robot Surg, Cleveland, OH 44195 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.urology.2008.06.010
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVES To present the initial experience in laparoscopic radical prostatectomy performed exclusively through an umbilical incision using a single three-channel port and specially designed flexible laparoscopic instrumentation. METHODS Since November 26, 2007, we have performed single-port laparoscopic radical prostatectomy in 4 patients diagnosed with prostate cancer. Patients with early-stage prostate cancer (T1c), no previous pelvic surgery, and a body mass index :535 kg/m(2) were selected for single-port laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. A multichannel port was inserted transperitoneally through a 1.8-CM umbilical incision. No additional extraumbilical instruments or ports were inserted. Urethrovesical anastomosis was performed using free-hand interrupted suturing and extracorporeal knot tying. Data were collected prospectively into our institutional review board-approved data registry. RESULTS All cases were completed successfully, without conversion to a standard laparoscopic approach. The total operative time was 285 +/- 30 minutes, with a mean operative time for prostate excision and urethrovesical anastomosis of 3.25 hours and 1.1 hours, respectively. The mean blood loss was 288 +/- 131 mL, and no patient required a blood transfusion. The hospital stay was 2.5 +/- 0.6 days. The Foley catheter was removed 2 weeks (range 1-3) after surgery. No intraoperative complications Occurred; however, 1 patient developed a rectourethral fistula that was noted 2 months after surgery. At 18 weeks of follow-up, 3 patients used 1 or 0 pads for continence daily, 2 patients had positive margins noted at the site of extracapsular extension, and all patients had an undetectable prostate-specific antigen level. CONCLUSIONS Single-port laparoscopic radical prostatectomy is feasible. Additional investigation is needed to evaluate the safety and oncologic adequacy of this new approach. UROLOGY 72: 1190-1193, 2008. (C) 2008 Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:1190 / 1193
页数:4
相关论文
共 7 条
[1]  
*AM CANC SOC, 2007, CANC STAT
[2]   Transvaginal single-port NOTES nephrectomy: Initial laboratory experience [J].
Clayman, Ralph V. ;
Box, Geoffrey N. ;
Abraham, Jose Benito A. ;
Lee, Hak J. ;
Deane, Leslie A. ;
Sargent, Eric R. ;
Nguyen, Ninh T. ;
Chang, Kenneth ;
Tan, Amy K. ;
Ponsky, Lee E. ;
McDougall, Elspeth M. .
JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2007, 21 (06) :640-644
[3]   Scarless single port transumbilical nephrectomy and pyeloplasty: first clinical report [J].
Desai, Mihir M. ;
Rao, Pradeep P. ;
Aron, Monish ;
Pascal-Haber, Georges ;
Desai, Mahesh R. ;
Mishra, Shashikant ;
Kaouk, Jihad H. ;
Gill, Inderbir S. .
BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2008, 101 (01) :83-88
[4]  
Hegarty Nicholas J, 2006, Can J Urol, V13 Suppl 1, P56
[5]   Single-port laparoscopic surgery in urology: Initial experience [J].
Kaouk, Jihad H. ;
Haber, George-Pascal ;
Goel, Raj K. ;
Desai, Mihir M. ;
Aron, Monish ;
Rackley, Raymond R. ;
Moore, Courtenay ;
Gill, Inderbir S. .
UROLOGY, 2008, 71 (01) :3-6
[6]  
PAULI EM, 2008, GASTROINTEST EN 0214
[7]   Da Vinci robot error and failure rates: Single institution experience on a single three-arm robot unit of more than 700 consecutive robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomies [J].
Zorn, Kevin C. ;
Gofrit, Ofer N. ;
Orvieto, Marcelo A. ;
Mikhail, Albert A. ;
Galocy, R. Matthew ;
Shalhav, Arieh L. ;
Zagaja, Gregory P. .
JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2007, 21 (11) :1341-1344