Computational ADME/Tox Modeling: Aiding Understanding and Enhancing Decision Making in Drug Design

被引:9
作者
Delisle, Robert K. [1 ]
Lowrie, Jeffery F. [1 ]
Hobbs, Doug W. [2 ]
Diller, David. J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Pharmacopeia Inc, Mol Modeling, Princeton, NJ 08543 USA
[2] Pharmacopeia Inc, Chem, Princeton, NJ 08543 USA
关键词
D O I
10.2174/157340905774330309
中图分类号
R914 [药物化学];
学科分类号
100701 ;
摘要
With recent estimates of drug development costs on the order of $800 million and increased pressure to reduce consumer drug costs, it is not surprising that the pharmaceutical industry is keenly interested in reducing the overall expense associated with drug development. An analysis of the reasons for attrition during the drug development process found that over half of all failures can be attributed to problems with human or animal pharmacokinetics and toxicity. Discovering pharmacokinetics and toxicity liabilities late within the drug development process results in wasted resource expenditures. This argues dramatically for evaluation of these properties as early as possible, leading to the concept of "Fail Early". Computational models provide a low cost, flexible evaluation of compound properties that can be implemented and used prior to chemical synthesis thereby creating an alternative philosophy of "Design for Success". Here we review the history and current trends within ADME/Tox modeling and discuss important issues related to development of computational models. In addition, we review some of the commercially available tools to achieve this goal as well as methods developed internally to address these issues from the design stage through development and optimization of drug candidates. In particular, we highlight those features that we feel best exemplify the Design for Success philosophy.
引用
收藏
页码:325 / 345
页数:21
相关论文
共 179 条
[1]   The correlation and prediction of the solubility of compounds in water using an amended solvation energy relationship [J].
Abraham, MH ;
Le, J .
JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES, 1999, 88 (09) :868-880
[2]   Hydrogen bond structural group constants [J].
Abraham, MH ;
Platts, JA .
JOURNAL OF ORGANIC CHEMISTRY, 2001, 66 (10) :3484-3491
[3]   Application of hydrogen bonding calculations in property based drug design [J].
Abraham, MH ;
Ibrahim, A ;
Zissimos, AM ;
Zhao, YH ;
Comer, J ;
Reynolds, DP .
DRUG DISCOVERY TODAY, 2002, 7 (20) :1056-1063
[4]   The factors that influence permeation across the blood-brain barrier [J].
Abraham, MH .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY, 2004, 39 (03) :235-240
[5]   Conformer- and alignment-independent model for predicting structurally diverse competitive CYP2C9 inhibitors [J].
Afzelius, L ;
Zamora, I ;
Masimirembwa, CM ;
Karlén, A ;
Andersson, TB ;
Mecucci, S ;
Baroni, M ;
Cruciani, G .
JOURNAL OF MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY, 2004, 47 (04) :907-914
[6]  
Agrafiotis D. K., 1998, ENCY COMPUTATIONAL C, V1, P742
[7]   Combinatorial informatics in the post-genomics era [J].
Agrafiotis, DK ;
Lobanov, VS ;
Salemme, FR .
NATURE REVIEWS DRUG DISCOVERY, 2002, 1 (05) :337-346
[8]   Advances in diversity profiling and combinatorial series design [J].
Agrafiotis, DK ;
Myslik, JC ;
Salemme, FR .
MOLECULAR DIVERSITY, 1998, 4 (01) :1-22
[9]   Can we learn to distinguish between "drug-like" and "nondrug-like" molecules? [J].
Ajay ;
Walters, WP ;
Murcko, MA .
JOURNAL OF MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY, 1998, 41 (18) :3314-3324
[10]   Predicting human oral bioavailability of a compound: Development of a novel quantitative structure-bioavailability relationship [J].
Andrews, CW ;
Bennett, L ;
Yu, LX .
PHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH, 2000, 17 (06) :639-644