Reduced medium-term mortality following primary total hip and knee arthroplasty with an enhanced recovery program A study of 4,500 consecutive procedures

被引:79
作者
Savaridas, Terence
Serrano-Pedraza, Ignacio [1 ]
Khan, Sameer K. [2 ]
Martin, Kate [2 ]
Malviya, Ajay [2 ]
Reed, Mike R. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Complutense Madrid, Madrid, Spain
[2] Northumbria Healthcare NHS Fdn Trust, Northumbria, England
关键词
RANDOMIZED CLINICAL-TRIAL; REPLACEMENT; SURGERY; CARE;
D O I
10.3109/17453674.2013.771298
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background and purpose Our unit started to use routine multimodal techniques to enhance recovery for hip and knee arthroplasty in 2008. We have previously reported earlier discharge, a trend toward a reduction in complications, and a statistically significant reduction in mortality up to 90 days after surgery. In this study, we evaluated the same cohort to determine whether survival benefits were maintained at 2 years. Patients and methods We prospectively evaluated 4,500 unselected consecutive total hip and knee replacements. The first 3,000 underwent a traditional protocol (TRAD) and the later 1,500 underwent an enhanced recovery protocol (ER). Mortality data were collected from the Office of National Statistics (UK). Results There was a difference in death rate at 2 years (TRAD vs. ER: 3.8% vs. 2.7%; p = 0.05). Survival probability up to 3.7 years post surgery was significantly better in patients who underwent an ER protocol. Interpretation This large prospective case series of unselected consecutive patients showed a reduction in mortality rate at 2 years following elective lower-limb hip and knee arthroplasty following the introduction of a multimodal enhanced recovery protocol. This survival benefit supports the routine use of an enhanced recovery program for hip and knee arthroplasty.
引用
收藏
页码:40 / 43
页数:4
相关论文
共 14 条
[1]   Reduced hospital stay and narcotic consumption, and improved mobilization with local and intraarticular infiltration after hip arthroplasty - A randomized clinical trial of an intraarticular technique versus epidural infusion in 80 patients [J].
Andersen, Karen V. ;
Pfeiffer-Jensen, Mogens ;
Haraldsted, Viggo ;
Soballe, Kjeld .
ACTA ORTHOPAEDICA, 2007, 78 (02) :180-186
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2003, Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions
[3]   Transfusion immunomodulation or TRIM: What does it mean clinically? [J].
Blajchman, MA .
HEMATOLOGY, 2005, 10 :208-214
[4]   The logrank test [J].
Bland, JM ;
Altman, DG .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2004, 328 (7447) :1073-1073
[5]  
CancerResearchUK, CANCERSTATS UK
[6]   Why still in hospital after fast-track hip and knee arthroplasty? [J].
Husted, Henrik ;
Lunn, Troels H. ;
Troelsen, Anders ;
Gaarn-Larsen, Lissi ;
Kristensen, Billy B. ;
Kehlet, Henrik .
ACTA ORTHOPAEDICA, 2011, 82 (06) :679-684
[7]   Readmissions after fast-track hip and knee arthroplasty [J].
Husted, Henrik ;
Otte, Kristian Stahl ;
Kristensen, Billy B. ;
Orsnes, Thue ;
Kehlet, Henrik .
ARCHIVES OF ORTHOPAEDIC AND TRAUMA SURGERY, 2010, 130 (09) :1185-1191
[8]   Multimodal strategies to improve surgical outcome [J].
Kehlet, H ;
Wilmore, DW .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2002, 183 (06) :630-641
[9]   Evidence-based surgical care and the evolution of fast-track surgery [J].
Kehlet, Henrik ;
Wilmore, Douglas W. .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2008, 248 (02) :189-198
[10]   Determinants of long-term survival after major surgery and the adverse effect of postoperative complications [J].
Khuri, SF ;
Henderson, WG ;
DePalma, RG ;
Mosca, C ;
Healey, NA ;
Kumbhani, DJ .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2005, 242 (03) :326-343