Propofol sedation during awake craniotomy for seizures: Patient-controlled administration versus neurolept analgesia

被引:65
作者
Herrick, IA
Craen, RA
Gelb, AW
Miller, LA
Kubu, CS
Girvin, JP
Parrent, AG
Eliasziw, M
Kirkby, J
机构
[1] UNIV WESTERN ONTARIO,JP ROBARTS RES INST,LONDON HLTH SCI CTR,DEPT PSYCHOL,LONDON,ON,CANADA
[2] UNIV WESTERN ONTARIO,JP ROBARTS RES INST,LONDON HLTH SCI CTR,DEPT CLIN NEUROL SCI,LONDON,ON,CANADA
[3] UNIV WESTERN ONTARIO,JP ROBARTS RES INST,LONDON HLTH SCI CTR,DEPT BIOSTAT & EPIDEMIOL,LONDON,ON,CANADA
关键词
D O I
10.1097/00000539-199706000-00021
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
This prospective study evaluated the safety and efficacy of patient-controlled sedation (PCS) using propofol during awake seizure surgery performed under bupivacaine scalp blocks. Thirty-seven patients were randomized to receive either propofol PCS combined with a basal infusion of propofol (n = 20) or neurolept analgesia using an initial bolus dose of fentanyl and droperidol followed by a fentanyl infusion (n = 17). Both groups received supplemental fentanyl and dimenhydrinate for intraoperative pain and nausea, respectively. Comparisons were made between groups for sedation, memory, and cognitive function, patient satisfaction, and incidence of complications. Levels of intraoperative sedation and patient satisfaction were similar between groups. Memory and cognitive function were well preserved in both groups. The incidence of transient episodes of ventilatory rate depression (<8 bpm) was more frequent among the propofol patients (5 vs 0, P = 0.04), particularly after supplemental doses of opioid. Intraoperative seizures were more common among the neurolept patients (7 vs 0, P = 0.002). PCS using propofol represents an effective alternative to neurolept analgesia during awake seizure surgery performed in a monitored care environment.
引用
收藏
页码:1285 / 1291
页数:7
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]  
ALLAN MWB, 1989, EUR J ANAESTH, V6, P379
[2]   CONSCIOUS-SEDATION ANALGESIA DURING CRANIOTOMY FOR INTRACTABLE EPILEPSY - A REVIEW OF 354 CONSECUTIVE CASES [J].
ARCHER, DP ;
MCKENNA, JMA ;
MORIN, L ;
RAVUSSIN, P .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA-JOURNAL CANADIEN D ANESTHESIE, 1988, 35 (04) :338-344
[3]  
BALDESSARINI RJ, 1985, PHARMACOL BASIS THER, P396
[4]  
BORGEAT A, 1992, ANESTH ANALG, V74, P539
[5]  
*CAN PHARM ASS, 1996, COMP PHARM SPEC, P666
[6]   MASKING OF EPILEPTIFORM ACTIVITY BY PROPOFOL DURING SEIZURE SURGERY [J].
DRUMMOND, JC ;
IRAGUIMADOZ, VJ ;
ALKSNE, JF ;
KALKMAN, CJ .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1992, 76 (04) :652-654
[7]   PATIENT-CONTROLLED DRUG ADMINISTRATION DURING LOCAL-ANESTHESIA - A COMPARISON OF MIDAZOLAM, PROPOFOL, AND ALFENTANIL [J].
GHOURI, AF ;
TAYLOR, E ;
WHITE, PF .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ANESTHESIA, 1992, 4 (06) :476-479
[8]   COMPARISON OF FENTANYL, SUFENTANIL AND ALFENTANIL DURING AWAKE CRANIOTOMY FOR EPILEPSY [J].
GIGNAC, E ;
MANNINEN, PH ;
GELB, AW .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA-JOURNAL CANADIEN D ANESTHESIE, 1993, 40 (05) :421-424
[9]   NEUROSURGICAL CONSIDERATIONS AND GENERAL-METHODS FOR CRANIOTOMY UNDER LOCAL-ANESTHESIA [J].
GIRVIN, JP .
INTERNATIONAL ANESTHESIOLOGY CLINICS, 1986, 24 (03) :89-114
[10]   PATIENT-CONTROLLED SEDATION USING PROPOFOL IN DAY SURGERY [J].
GRATTIDGE, P .
ANAESTHESIA, 1992, 47 (08) :683-685