Restoring the product variety and pro-competitive gains from trade with heterogeneous firms and bounded productivity

被引:57
作者
Feenstra, Robert C. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Davis, Davis, CA 95616 USA
[2] Natl Bur Econ Res, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Gains from trade; Heterogeneous firms; Bounded Pareto; Pro-competitive effect; Product variety; INTERNATIONAL-TRADE; MONOPOLISTIC COMPETITION; WELFARE; MODELS; MARKET;
D O I
10.1016/j.jinteco.2017.10.003
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The monopolistic competition model in international trade offers three sources of gains from trade beyond that of traditional comparative advantage: an endogenous expansion in product variety; a pro-competitive reduction in the markups charged by firms; and the self-selection of more efficient firms into exporting. Recent literature on trade with heterogeneous firms has emphasized the third of these effects, while the first two effects are ruled out when using a Pareto distribution for productivity with a support that is unbounded above, and no fixed costs. The goal of this paper is to restore a theoretical role for product variety and pro-competitive gains from trade by using a bounded Pareto distribution for productivity, and to demonstrate their empirical importance. For the U.S. economy over 1992-2005, we find that product variety and the reduction in markups jointly contribute about 75% to the increase in welfare resulting from trade expansion, whereas an upper bound to the selection effect is that it contributes the remaining 25% to the increase in U.S. welfare. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:16 / 27
页数:12
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]   Endogenous variety and the gains from trade [J].
Arkolakis, Costas ;
Demidova, Svetlana ;
Klenow, Peter J. ;
Rodriguez-Clare, Andres .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2008, 98 (02) :444-450
[2]   New Trade Models, Same Old Gains? [J].
Arkolakis, Costas ;
Costinot, Arnaud ;
Rodriguez-Clare, Andres .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2012, 102 (01) :94-130
[3]  
Arkolakis Costas, 2010, GAINS TRADE MONOPOLI
[4]  
Arkolakis Costas., 2017, The Elusive Pro-Competitive Effects of Trade
[5]  
ARMINGTON PS, 1969, INT MONET FUND S PAP, V16, P159
[6]   Pricing-to-Market, Trade Costs, and International Relative Prices [J].
Atkeson, Andrew ;
Burstein, Ariel .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2008, 98 (05) :1998-2031
[7]   Trade Liberalization with Heterogeneous Firms [J].
Baldwin, Richard E. ;
Forslid, Rikard .
REVIEW OF DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS, 2010, 14 (02) :161-176
[8]   General equilibrium models of monopolistic competition: A new approach [J].
Behrens, Kristian ;
Murata, Yasusada .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC THEORY, 2007, 136 (01) :776-787
[9]   Globalization and individual gains from trade [J].
Behrens, Kristian ;
Murata, Yasusada .
JOURNAL OF MONETARY ECONOMICS, 2012, 59 (08) :703-720
[10]   Plants and productivity in international trade [J].
Bernard, AB ;
Eaton, J ;
Jensen, JB ;
Kortum, S .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2003, 93 (04) :1268-1290