Effect of soil nutrient heterogeneity on the symmetry of belowground competition

被引:37
作者
Blair, B [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Sch Nat Resources & Environm, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
关键词
root competition; root foraging; root proliferation; size-asymmetric competition; size-symmetric competition; soil heterogeneity;
D O I
10.1023/A:1012664431933
中图分类号
Q94 [植物学];
学科分类号
071001 ;
摘要
Size variability in plant populations has been extensively studied and much of this inquiry has focused on the types of competition that are involved in increasing or decreasing size inequality. It is often assumed that competition for light is size-asymmetric, meaning that a plant can potentially dominate a competitive relationship through shading if it is taller than its competitor. The light resources obtained by the taller plant are thus disproportionate to its size. In contrast, competition for soil resources may be more size-symmetric, the amount of soil nutrients obtained seems to be in direct proportion to a plant's size. Most studies examining belowground competition have used homogeneously distributed nutrient resources. Soil homogeneity could make size-asymmetric belowground competition unlikely, but homogeneity is not often found in nature. In this study I use a greenhouse pot experiment utilizing Ipomoea tricolor to examine the hypothesis that size-asymmetric competition for soil nutrients may result when soil resource distribution is spatially heterogeneous. The results did not support the hypothesis of belowground size-asymmetric competition. Differences between experimental treatments and controls were not statistically significant suggesting size-symmetric competition. Implications of these results are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:199 / 203
页数:5
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]   ROLE OF FOLIAGE HABIT IN THE COMPETITION BETWEEN DIFFERENTLY SIZED PLANTS IN CARROT CROPS [J].
BENJAMIN, LR .
ANNALS OF BOTANY, 1984, 53 (04) :549-557
[2]  
CASPER B, 1997, ANNU REV ECOL SYST, V28, P254
[3]   Limited effects of soil nutrient heterogeneity on populations of Abutilon theophrasti (Malvaceae) [J].
Casper, BB ;
Cahill, JF .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BOTANY, 1996, 83 (03) :333-341
[4]   BOOTSTRAPPING THE GINI COEFFICIENT OF INEQUALITY [J].
DIXON, PM ;
WEINER, J ;
MITCHELLOLDS, T ;
WOODLEY, R .
ECOLOGY, 1987, 68 (05) :1548-1551
[5]   Nutrient foraging traits in 10 co-occurring plant species of contrasting life forms [J].
Einsmann, JC ;
Jones, RH ;
Pu, M ;
Mitchell, RJ .
JOURNAL OF ECOLOGY, 1999, 87 (04) :609-619
[6]   ARCHITECTURAL ANALYSIS OF PLANT-ROOT SYSTEMS .2. INFLUENCE OF NUTRIENT SUPPLY ON ARCHITECTURE IN CONTRASTING PLANT-SPECIES [J].
FITTER, AH ;
STICKLAND, TR .
NEW PHYTOLOGIST, 1991, 118 (03) :383-389
[7]   Patchy habitats, division of labour and growth dividends in clonal plants [J].
Hutchings, MJ ;
Wijesinghe, DK .
TRENDS IN ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION, 1997, 12 (10) :390-394
[8]  
JACKSON R, 1992, ECOLOGY, V74, P612
[9]   COMPETITION BETWEEN GRASSLAND PLANTS OF DIFFERENT INITIAL SIZES [J].
NEWBERY, DM ;
NEWMAN, EI .
OECOLOGIA, 1978, 33 (03) :361-380
[10]   ATMOSPHERIC CO2, SOIL-NITROGEN AND TURNOVER OF FINE ROOTS [J].
PREGITZER, KS ;
ZAK, DR ;
CURTIS, PS ;
KUBISKE, ME ;
TEERI, JA ;
VOGEL, CS .
NEW PHYTOLOGIST, 1995, 129 (04) :579-585