Effects of scale and logging on landscape structure in a forest mosaic

被引:11
作者
Leimgruber, P [1 ]
McShea, WJ [1 ]
Schnell, GD [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Zool Pk, Conservat & Res Ctr, Washington, DC 20008 USA
关键词
changing scale; forest logging; forest mosaic; landscape structure; spatial scale; thresholds;
D O I
10.1023/A:1013881319390
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Landscape structure in a forest mosaic changes with spatial scale (i.e. spatial extent) and thresholds may occur where structure changes markedly. Forest management alters landscape structure and may affect the intensity and location of thresholds. Our purpose was to examine landscape structure at different scales to determine thresholds where landscape structure changes markedly in managed forest mosaics of the Appalachian Mountains in the eastern United States. We also investigated how logging influences landscape structure and whether these management activities change threshold values. Using threshold and autocorrelation analyses, we found that thresholds in landscape indices exist at 400, 500, and 800 m intervals from the outer edge of management units in our study region. For landscape indices that consider all landcover categories, such as dominance and contagion, landscape structure and thresholds did not change after logging occurred. Measurements for these overall landscape indices were strongly influenced by midsuccessional deciduous forest, the most common landcover category in the landscape. When restricting analyses for mean patch size and percent cover to individual forest types, thresholds for early-successional forests changed after logging. However, logging changed the landscape structure at small spatial scale, but did not alter the structure of the entire forest mosaic. Previous forest management may already have increased the heterogeneity of the landscape beyond the point where additional small cuts alter the overall structure of the forest. Because measurements for landscape indices yield very different results at different spatial scales, it is important first to identify thresholds in order to determine the appropriate scales for landscape ecological studies. We found that threshold and autocorrelation analyses were simple but powerful tools for the detection of appropriate scales in the managed forest mosaic under study.
引用
收藏
页码:141 / 166
页数:26
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], [No title captured]
[2]   THE R LE-PROGRAMS FOR MULTISCALE ANALYSIS OF LANDSCAPE STRUCTURE USING THE GRASS GEOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION-SYSTEM [J].
BAKER, WL ;
CAI, YM .
LANDSCAPE ECOLOGY, 1992, 7 (04) :291-302
[3]   THE LANDSCAPE ECOLOGY OF LARGE DISTURBANCES IN THE DESIGN AND MANAGEMENT OF NATURE-RESERVES [J].
BAKER, WL .
LANDSCAPE ECOLOGY, 1992, 7 (03) :181-194
[4]  
BAKER WL, 1994, RLE PROGRAMS SET GRA
[5]   Microhabitat and landscape characteristics associated with the threatened Allegheny woodrat [J].
Balcom, BJ ;
Yahner, RH .
CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 1996, 10 (02) :515-525
[6]  
Cliff AD., 1981, Spatial processes :models and applications
[7]   COMMUNITIES IN A LANDSCAPE - THE INFLUENCE OF HABITAT HETEROGENEITY ON THE INTERACTIONS BETWEEN SPECIES [J].
DANIELSON, BJ .
AMERICAN NATURALIST, 1991, 138 (05) :1105-1120
[8]   Effect of landscape structure on Common Vole (Microtus arvalis) distribution and abundance at several space scales [J].
Delattre, P ;
Giraudoux, P ;
Baudry, J ;
Quere, JP ;
Fichet, E .
LANDSCAPE ECOLOGY, 1996, 11 (05) :279-288
[9]  
*ERDAS, 1997, ERDAS FIELD GUID
[10]   Creating landscape patterns by forest cutting: Ecological consequences and principles [J].
Franklin, Jerry E. ;
Forman, Richard T. T. .
LANDSCAPE ECOLOGY, 1987, 1 (01) :5-18