Perceptual learning style and learning proficiency:: A test of the hypothesis

被引:90
作者
Krätzig, GP [1 ]
Arbuthnott, KD [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Regina, Campion Coll, Dept Psychol, Regina, SK S4S 0A2, Canada
关键词
learning styles; sensory modality; memory; self-report questionnaires; metacognition;
D O I
10.1037/0022-0663.98.1.238
中图分类号
G44 [教育心理学];
学科分类号
0402 ; 040202 ;
摘要
Given the potential importance of using modality preference with instruction, the authors tested whether learning style preference correlated with memory performance in each of 3 sensory modalities: visual, auditory, and kinesthetic. In Study 1, participants completed objective measures of pictorial, auditory, and tactile learning and learning style self-assessments. The results indicate that objective test performance did not correlate with learning style preference. In Study 2, the authors examined in more detail the information participants used to answer the learning style self-assessment. The findings indicate that participants answered the inventory using general memories and beliefs rather than specific examples of learning in different modalities. These results challenge the hypothesis that individuals learn best with material presented in a particular sensory modality.
引用
收藏
页码:238 / 246
页数:9
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2002, CLEARING HOUSE, DOI DOI 10.1080/00098650209599254
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2002, ONLINE J DISTANCE LE
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1993, EMERG LIBR
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2004, Neuropsychological Assessment
[5]  
Arthur G. A., 1947, POINT SCALE PERFORMA
[6]  
Babcock H., 1930, Archives of Psychology, V117, P105
[7]  
Babcock H., 1940, TEST MANUAL DIRECTIO
[8]  
BARBE WB, 1981, EDUC LEADERSHIP, V38, P378
[9]  
Barsch J., 1991, BARSCH LEARNING STYL
[10]  
Begoray J., 1998, Journal of Research in Childhood Education, V13, P71, DOI [DOI 10.1080/02568549809594728, 10.1080/02568549809594728]