Methodological issues in determining rates of childhood immunization in office practice - A study from pediatric research in office settings (PROS)

被引:26
作者
Darden, PM
Taylor, JA
Slora, EJ
Hasemeier, CM
Asmussen, L
Recknor, JC
Wasserman, RC
机构
[1] UNIV WASHINGTON,SCH MED,DEPT PEDIAT,SEATTLE,WA 98195
[2] AMER ACAD PEDIAT,PEDIAT RES OFF SETTINGS,ELK GROVE VILLAGE,IL
[3] UNIV VERMONT,COLL MED,DEPT PEDIAT,BURLINGTON,VT
来源
ARCHIVES OF PEDIATRICS & ADOLESCENT MEDICINE | 1996年 / 150卷 / 10期
关键词
D O I
10.1001/archpedi.1996.02170350029004
中图分类号
R72 [儿科学];
学科分类号
100202 ;
摘要
Objective: To compare 3 methods for measuring pediatric office immunization rates. Design: Retrospective and prospective cross-sectional surveys. Patients: Children 2 and 3 years old from 15 pediatric practices in 11 states. Methods: Immunization rates were determined for each practice using 3 methods. The Consecutive method used data from the practice's medical records of patients seen consecutively in the office; the Chart method used data from randomly selected practice medical records; and the Active method (reference standard) used a combination of medical record data with a telephone interview to collect additional immunization data and current patient status, using data only on current patients. Analyses were based on a mean of 57, 62, and 51 (Consecutive, Chart, and Active method, respectively) patients per practice. Patients were considered fully immunized if they had received 4 doses of DTP/DT vaccine, 3 doses of OPV/IPV, and 1 dose of MMR vaccine by their second birthday. Comparisons were made using the paired t test. Results: The mean immunization rate by method was Consecutive, 81.5% (range, 51%-97%); Chart, 71.6% (range, 42%-94%); and Active, 79.6% (range, 53%-96%). Within a given practice, the differences between methods varied considerably (0 to 28 percentage points). The mean difference from the reference standard Active method was 8 percentage points (P<.001) for the Chart method and -1.9 percentage points (P=.36) for the Consecutive method. The largest difference was between the Consecutive and Chart methods (mean difference, 9.9 percentage points; P=.003). Practitioners uniformly found the Consecutive method easiest to implement. Conclusions: Practice-specific immunization rates are one of the few objective measures of the quality of preventive pediatric care. Pediatric practices monitoring their immunization rates should consider using the Consecutive method, a simple, acceptable, and valid measure of practice immunization rate.
引用
收藏
页码:1027 / 1031
页数:5
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1990, NUTR TODAY
[2]   THE RESURGENCE OF MEASLES IN THE UNITED-STATES, 1989-1990 [J].
ATKINSON, WL ;
ORENSTEIN, WA ;
KRUGMAN, S .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF MEDICINE, 1992, 43 :451-463
[3]  
BADGETT JT, 1994, ARCH PEDIAT ADOLESC, V147, pP29
[4]  
*CDC, 1992, GUID ASS VACC LEV 2
[5]  
COHEN JW, 1995, HLTH AFF MILLWOOD, V14, P225
[6]  
Corrigan J M, 1993, Jt Comm J Qual Improv, V19, P566
[7]  
*CTR HLTH EC RES, 1993, ACC HLTH CAR KEY IND, P46
[8]  
DOLTON T, 1974, STAT MED, P167
[9]   EPIGLOTTITIS IN CHILDREN, 1979 THROUGH 1992 - EFFECTS OF HAEMOPHILUS-INFLUENZAE TYPE-B IMMUNIZATION [J].
GORELICK, MH ;
BAKER, MD .
ARCHIVES OF PEDIATRICS & ADOLESCENT MEDICINE, 1994, 148 (01) :47-50
[10]  
HINMAN AR, 1990, PEDIATRICS, V86, P1064