A sensitometric comparison of four dental X-ray films and their diagnostic accuracy

被引:18
作者
Svenson, B
Welander, U
Shi, XQ
Stamatakis, H
Tronje, G
机构
[1] Department of Oral Radiology, Postgraduate Dental Education Center, Box 1126
[2] Department of Oral Radiology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm
关键词
radiography; dental; diagnostic errors; ROC curve; X-ray film;
D O I
10.1038/sj.dmfr.4600256
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Objectives:To compare the sensitometric properties and accuracy in the diagnosis of approximal caries of two E-speed (Ektaspeed Plus and EV 57) and two D-speed (Ultra-speed and DV 57) films. Methods: Speed and contrast for the four films were determined following 30 exposures for each film. Base plus fog density was measured on unexposed films and the increase was studied over a 18-month period. Seventy-five extracted premolars with known pathology were radiographed under standardized conditions and the radiographs assessed by nine observers for approximal caries, Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve technique was used to analyse the diagnostic accuracy. Results: The sensitometric analysis showed that the Ektaspeed Plus film had the highest speed of the four films. At a density of 1.0 it was 2.28 times faster than Ultra-speed. The contrast of Ektaspeed Plus was comparable with that of the other films and base plus fog density plateaued at 0.4 ten months before expiry date. There were no statistically significant differences in diagnostic accuracy for white spot lesions between the four films. For cavitations there was a significant difference between EV 57 and DV 57 and Ektaspeed Plus (P = 0.005) but not between Ultra-speed and Ektaspeed Plus nor between Ultra-speed and EV 57 and DV 57. Conclusion: Ektaspeed Plus film is comparable with D-speed and a conventional D-speed film. Since it is at present the fastest available dental film it should be recommended for general dental practice.
引用
收藏
页码:230 / 235
页数:6
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]   OBJECTIVE AND SUBJECTIVE EVALUATIONS OF KODAK EKTASPEED-PLUS DENTAL-X-RAY FILM [J].
CONOVER, GL ;
HILDEBOLT, CF ;
ANTHONY, D .
ORAL SURGERY ORAL MEDICINE ORAL PATHOLOGY ORAL RADIOLOGY AND ENDODONTICS, 1995, 79 (02) :246-250
[2]   RADIOGRAPHIC QUALITY-CONTROL MEASUREMENTS COMPARING D-SPEED FILM, E-SPEED FILM, AND XERORADIOGRAPHY [J].
DIEHL, R ;
GRATT, BM ;
GOULD, RG .
ORAL SURGERY ORAL MEDICINE ORAL PATHOLOGY ORAL RADIOLOGY AND ENDODONTICS, 1986, 61 (06) :635-640
[3]   CLINICAL-EVALUATION OF EKTASPEED X-RAY-FILM FOR USE IN ENDODONTICS [J].
DONNELLY, JC ;
HARTWELL, GR ;
JOHNSON, WB .
JOURNAL OF ENDODONTICS, 1985, 11 (02) :90-94
[4]  
*EASTM KOD CO, 1994, NEW KOD EKT PLUS INT
[5]  
Frykholm A, 1983, Dentomaxillofac Radiol, V12, P47
[6]   PATIENT RISK FROM INTERPROXIMAL RADIOGRAPHY [J].
GIBBS, SJ ;
PUJOL, A ;
CHEN, TS ;
MALCOLM, AW ;
JAMES, AE .
ORAL SURGERY ORAL MEDICINE ORAL PATHOLOGY ORAL RADIOLOGY AND ENDODONTICS, 1984, 58 (03) :347-354
[7]   AN EVALUATION OF KODAK EKTASPEED PERIAPICAL FILM FOR USE IN ENDODONTICS [J].
GIRSCH, WJ ;
MATTESON, SR ;
MCKEE, MN .
JOURNAL OF ENDODONTICS, 1983, 9 (07) :282-288
[8]   SURVEY OF RADIOLOGIC PRACTICES AMONG DENTAL PRACTITIONERS [J].
GOREN, AD ;
SCIUBBA, JJ ;
FRIEDMAN, R ;
MALAMUD, H .
ORAL SURGERY ORAL MEDICINE ORAL PATHOLOGY ORAL RADIOLOGY AND ENDODONTICS, 1989, 67 (04) :464-468
[9]   A CLINICAL COMPARISON OF XERORADIOGRAPHY AND CONVENTIONAL FILM FOR THE INTERPRETATION OF PERIAPICAL STRUCTURES [J].
GRATT, BM ;
WHITE, SC ;
LUCATORTO, FM ;
SAPP, JP ;
KAFFE, I .
JOURNAL OF ENDODONTICS, 1986, 12 (08) :346-351
[10]   APPROXIMAL CARIES AND FREQUENCY OF BITEWING EXAMINATIONS IN SWEDISH CHILDREN AND ADOLESCENTS [J].
GRONDAHL, HG ;
LITH, A ;
JONSSON, G ;
PERSSON, Y .
COMMUNITY DENTISTRY AND ORAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1992, 20 (01) :20-24