HEAD-TRUNK KINEMATICS DURING HIGH-VELOCITY-LOW-AMPLITUDE MANIPULATION OF THE CERVICAL SPINE IN ASYMPTOMATIC SUBJECTS: HELICAL AXIS COMPUTATION AND ANATOMIC MOTION MODELING

被引:5
作者
Dugailly, Pierre-Michel [1 ]
Sobczak, Stephane [2 ]
Van Geyt, Bernard [3 ]
Bonnechere, Bruno [2 ]
Maroye, Laura [4 ]
Moiseev, Fedor [2 ]
Rooze, Marcel [5 ]
Salvia, Patrick [2 ]
Feipel, Veronique [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Libre Bruxelles, Dept Osteopath Sci, B-1070 Brussels, Belgium
[2] Univ Libre Bruxelles, Fac Med, Lab Biomech Anat & Organogenesis, B-1070 Brussels, Belgium
[3] Univ Libre Bruxelles, Fac Motor Sci, Funct Anat Lab, B-1070 Brussels, Belgium
[4] Univ Libre Bruxelles, Fac Motor Sci, Res Unit Osteopathy, B-1070 Brussels, Belgium
[5] Univ Libre Bruxelles, Fac Med, Lab Biomech Anat & Organogenesis, Dept Anat, B-1070 Brussels, Belgium
关键词
Cervical Manipulation; Range of Motion; Kinematics; Biomechanics; MECHANICAL NECK PAIN; THORACIC THRUST MANIPULATION; RANDOMIZED CLINICAL-TRIAL; LOW-BACK-PAIN; RISK-ASSESSMENT; GLIDING TEST; IN-VIVO; JOINT; MOBILIZATION; MOVEMENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.jmpt.2014.10.019
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
100404 [儿少卫生与妇幼保健学];
摘要
Objective: This study aimed to analyze the in vivo 3-dimensional kinematics of the head during cervical manipulation including helical axis (HA) computation and anatomic motion representation. Methods: Twelve asymptomatic volunteers were included in this study. An osteopathic practitioner performed 1 to 3 manipulations (high-velocity and low-amplitude [HVLA] multiple component technique) of the cervical spine (between C-2 and C-5) with the patient in the sitting position. During manipulation, head motion was collected using an optoelectronic system and expressed relative to the thorax. Motion data were processed to analyze primary and coupled motions and HA parameters. Anatomic motion representation including HA was obtained. Results: During manipulation, average maximal range of motion was 39 degrees (SD, 6 degrees), 21 degrees (SD, 7 degrees), and 8 degrees (SD, 5 degrees) for lateral bending (LB), axial rotation (AR), and flexion extension, respectively. For the impulse period, magnitude averaged of 8 degrees (SD, 2 degrees), 5 degrees (SD, 2 degrees), and 3 degrees (SD, 2 degrees), for LB, AR, and flexion extension, respectively. Mean impulse velocity was 139 degrees/s (SD, 39 degrees/s). Concerning AR/LB ratios, an average of 0.6 (SD, 0.3) was observed for global motion, premanipulation positioning, and impulse. Mean HA was mostly located ipsilateral to the impulse side and displayed an oblique orientation. Conclusion: This study demonstrated limited range of AR during cervical spine manipulation and provided new perspectives for the development of visualization tools, which might be helpful for practitioners and for the analysis of cervical manipulation using HA computation and anatomic representation of motion.
引用
收藏
页码:416 / 424
页数:9
相关论文
共 59 条
[1]
Assendelft WJJ, 1996, J FAM PRACTICE, V42, P475
[2]
HELICAL AXES OF PASSIVE KNEE-JOINT MOTIONS [J].
BLANKEVOORT, L ;
HUISKES, R ;
DELANGE, A .
JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS, 1990, 23 (12) :1219-1229
[3]
Bonnechere B, 2011, P 23 C INT SOC BIOM, P23
[4]
Influence of movement speed on cervical range of motion [J].
Bonnechere, Bruno ;
Salvia, Patrick ;
Dugailly, Pierre-Michel ;
Maroye, Laura ;
Van Geyt, Bernard ;
Feipel, Veronique .
EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2014, 23 (08) :1688-1693
[5]
POSITION AND ORIENTATION IN-SPACE OF BONES DURING MOVEMENT - ANATOMICAL FRAME DEFINITION AND DETERMINATION [J].
CAPPOZZO, A ;
CATANI, F ;
DELLA CROCE, U ;
LEARDINI, A .
CLINICAL BIOMECHANICS, 1995, 10 (04) :171-178
[6]
Reproducibility of kinematic motion coupling parameters during manual upper cervical axial rotation mobilization: A 3-dimensional in vitro study of the atlanto-axial joint [J].
Cattrysse, E. ;
Provyn, S. ;
Kool, P. ;
Gagey, O. ;
Clarys, J. P. ;
Van Roy, P. .
JOURNAL OF ELECTROMYOGRAPHY AND KINESIOLOGY, 2009, 19 (01) :93-104
[7]
Chung CL, 2014, J MANIPULAT IN PRESS
[8]
DABBS V, 1995, J MANIP PHYSIOL THER, V18, P530
[9]
Daffner RH, 2010, AM FAM PHYSICIAN, V82, P959
[10]
Descarreaux Martin, 2006, Spine J, V6, P138, DOI 10.1016/j.spinee.2005.07.001