The concentration term and derivation of cleanup goals using probabilistic risk assessment

被引:3
作者
Bowers, TS [1 ]
机构
[1] Gradient Corp, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
来源
HUMAN AND ECOLOGICAL RISK ASSESSMENT | 1999年 / 5卷 / 04期
关键词
probabilistic risk; cleanup goals; target risk; concentration; uncertainty; variability;
D O I
10.1080/10807039.1999.9657741
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
This communication examines the role of back-calculation in developing a cleanup goal from a probabilistic risk assessment. Although 'back-calculation is not always appropriate with a Monte Carlo analysis, if the target risk level is specified as a single value (e.g., 95% of the population must have a cancer risk below 10(-5)), then back-calculation can be used to solve for a cleanup goal that represents an average concentration for an exposure area consistent with the stated target risk. This rule applies in developing screening levels and in probabilistic risk assessments that examine the influence of uncertainty in the average concentration. Back-calculation is not used to develop cleanup goals when risks arising from variable concentrations are assessed, for example, when exposure areas are very small such as for some ecological receptors, or when exposure frequency is very low such as for tourist fishermen. In this case, the cleanup goal is derived from an iterative risk calculation considering various possible truncation values of the concentration distribution. A cleanup goal derived in this manner does not correspond to a required average, but rather represents the maximum concentration that should be left in the field. Finally, although single value target risk specifications are common today, there may be advantages to setting target risks for multiple percentiles of the population, complicating the effort to calculate a cleanup goal.
引用
收藏
页码:809 / 821
页数:13
相关论文
共 10 条
[1]   PROBABILISTIC HEALTH RISK ASSESSMENT FOR EXPOSURES TO ESTUARY SEDIMENTS AND BIOTA CONTAMINATED WITH POLYCHLORINATED-BIPHENYLS, POLYCHLORINATED TERPHENYLS AND OTHER TOXIC-SUBSTANCES [J].
ADAMS, MR ;
HANNA, CA ;
MAYERNIK, JA ;
MENDEZ, WM .
RISK ANALYSIS, 1994, 14 (04) :577-594
[2]   Statistical approach to meeting soil cleanup goals [J].
Bowers, TS ;
Shifrin, NS ;
Murphy, BL .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 1996, 30 (05) :1437-1444
[3]  
Burmaster D.E., 1995, HUM ECOL RISK ASSESS, V1, P89
[4]  
BURMASTER DE, 1995, HUM ECOL RISK ASSESS, V1, P101
[5]   The use of two-stage Monte Carlo simulation techniques to characterize variability and uncertainty in risk analysis [J].
Cohen, JT ;
Lampson, MA ;
Bowers, TS .
HUMAN AND ECOLOGICAL RISK ASSESSMENT, 1996, 2 (04) :939-971
[6]   What Monte Carlo methods cannot do [J].
Ferson, S .
HUMAN AND ECOLOGICAL RISK ASSESSMENT, 1996, 2 (04) :990-1007
[7]  
FERSON S, 1995, HYDROCARBON CONTAMIN, V5, P245
[8]  
Land CE, 1975, SELECTED TABLES MATH, VIII, P385
[9]   USE OF A MONTE-CARLO SIMULATION FOR HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT AT THE SUPERFUND SITE [J].
SMITH, RL .
RISK ANALYSIS, 1994, 14 (04) :433-439
[10]   MONTE-CARLO TECHNIQUES FOR QUANTITATIVE UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS IN PUBLIC-HEALTH RISK ASSESSMENTS [J].
THOMPSON, KM ;
BURMASTER, DE ;
CROUCH, EAC .
RISK ANALYSIS, 1992, 12 (01) :53-63