Comparative Analysis of Carbonization Drivers in China's Megacities

被引:37
作者
Chong, Wang Hei Bruce [2 ]
Guan, Dabo [1 ,3 ]
Guthrie, Peter [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Leeds, Sch Earth & Environm, Sustainabil Res Inst, Leeds LS2 9JT, W Yorkshire, England
[2] Univ Hong Kong, Dept Civil Engn, Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[3] Univ Cambridge, St Edmunds Coll, Cambridge, England
[4] Univ Cambridge, Dept Engn, Ctr Sustainable Dev, Cambridge CB2 1PZ, England
关键词
carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions; climate change; greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions; index decomposition analysis; industrial ecology; low carbon cities; DECOMPOSITION ANALYSIS; CO2; EMISSIONS; FLOATING POPULATION; ENERGY-INTENSITY; CONSUMPTION; TRADE;
D O I
10.1111/j.1530-9290.2012.00519.x
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This study investigates the key drivers affecting emission increases in terms of population growth, economic growth, industrial transformation, and energy use in six Chinese megacities: Beijing, Shanghai, Tianjin, Chongqing, Guangzhou, and Hong Kong. The six cities represent the most-developed regions in China and they have similar per capita carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions as many developed countries. There is an urgent need to quantify the magnitude of each factor in driving the emissions changes in those cities so that a potential bottom-up climate mitigation policy design at the city and sectoral levels can be initiated. We adopt index decomposition analysis and present the results in both additive and multiplicative approaches to reveal the absolute and relative levels of each factor in driving emission changes during 19852007. Among all cities, economic effect and energy intensity effect have always been the two dominant factors contributing to the changes in carbon emissions. This study reveals that there are large variations in the ways driving forces contribute to emission levels in different cities and industrial sectors.
引用
收藏
页码:564 / 575
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]   Sources of output change in China: 1987-1997: application of a structural decomposition analysis [J].
Andreosso-O'Callaghan, B ;
Yue, GQ .
APPLIED ECONOMICS, 2002, 34 (17) :2227-2237
[2]   China's ongoing energy efficiency drive: Origins, progress and prospects [J].
Andrews-Speed, Philip .
ENERGY POLICY, 2009, 37 (04) :1331-1344
[3]   Energy decomposition analysis: IEA model versus other methods [J].
Ang, B. W. ;
Liu, Na .
ENERGY POLICY, 2007, 35 (03) :1426-1432
[4]   Accounting frameworks for tracking energy efficiency trends [J].
Ang, B. W. ;
Mu, A. R. ;
Zhou, P. .
ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2010, 32 (05) :1209-1219
[5]   DECOMPOSITION OF INDUSTRIAL ENERGY-CONSUMPTION - SOME METHODOLOGICAL AND APPLICATION ISSUES [J].
ANG, BW ;
LEE, SY .
ENERGY ECONOMICS, 1994, 16 (02) :83-92
[6]   The LMDI approach to decomposition analysis: a practical guide [J].
Ang, BW .
ENERGY POLICY, 2005, 33 (07) :867-871
[7]   Decomposition analysis for policymaking in energy: which is the preferred method? [J].
Ang, BW .
ENERGY POLICY, 2004, 32 (09) :1131-1139
[8]   A survey of index decomposition analysis in energy and environmental studies [J].
Ang, BW ;
Zhang, FQ .
ENERGY, 2000, 25 (12) :1149-1176
[9]  
[Anonymous], CHINA ENERGY STAT YB
[10]  
[Anonymous], WORLD URB PROSP 2009