Adjuvant external beam radiotherapy in the treatment of endometrial cancer (MRC ASTEC and NCIC CTG EN.5 randomised trials): pooled trial results,, systematic review, and meta-analysis

被引:474
作者
Blake, P. [3 ]
Swart, Ann Marie [1 ,2 ]
Orton, J. [4 ]
Kitchener, H. [5 ]
Whelan, T. [6 ]
Lukka, H. [6 ]
Eisenhauer, E. [7 ]
Bacon, M. [7 ]
Tu, D. [7 ]
Parmar, M. K. B. [1 ]
Amos, C. [1 ]
Murray, C. [1 ]
Qian, W. [1 ]
机构
[1] MRC, Clin Trials Unit, London NW1 2DA, England
[2] UCL, Ctr Clin Pharmacol, London, England
[3] Royal Marsden Hosp, London SW3 6JJ, England
[4] St James Inst Oncol, Leeds, W Yorkshire, England
[5] Univ Manchester, Sch Canc & Imaging Sci, Manchester, Lancs, England
[6] Hamilton Hlth Sci, Juravinski Canc Ctr, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[7] Queens Univ, NCIC CTG, Kingston, ON, Canada
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
SURGERY; CARCINOMA;
D O I
10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61767-5
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background Early endometrial cancer with low-risk pathological features can be successfully treated by surgery alone. External beam radiotherapy added to surgery has been investigated in several small trials, which have mainly included women at intermediate risk of recurrence. in these trials, postoperative radiotherapy has been shown to reduce the risk of isolated local recurrence but there is no evidence that it improves recurrence-free or overall survival. We report the findings from the ASTEC and EN.5 trials, which investigated adjuvant external beam radiotherapy in women with early-stage disease and pathological features suggestive of intermediate or high risk of recurrence and death from endometrial cancer. Methods Between July, 1.996, and March, 2005, 905 (789 ASTEC, 1.16 EN.5) women with intermediate-risk or high-risk early-stage disease from 112 centres in seven countries (UK, Canada, Poland, Norway, New Zealand, Australia, USA) were randomly assigned after surgery to observation (453) or to external beam radiotherapy (452). A target dose of 40-46 Gy in 20-25 daily fractions to the pelvis, treating five times a week, was specified. Primary outcome measure was overall survival, and all analyses were by intention to treat. These trials were registered ISRCTN 16571884 (ASTEC) and NCT 00002807 (EN.5). Findings After a median follow-up of 58 months, 1.35 women (68 observation, 67 external beam radiotherapy) had died. There was no evidence that overall survival with external beam radiotherapy was better than observation, hazard ratio 1. 05 (95% Cl 0.75-1.48; p=0.77). 5-year overall survival was 84% in both groups. Combining data from ASTEC and EN.5 in a meta-analysis of trials confirmed that there was no benefit in terms of overall survival (hazard ratio 1. 04; 95% Cl 0 . 84-1 . 29) and can reliably exclude an absolute benefit of external beam radiotherapy at 5 years of more than 3%. With brachytherapy used in 53% of women in ASTEC/EN.5, the local recurrence rate in the observation group at 5 years was 6. 1%. Interpretation Adjuvant external beam radiotherapy cannot be recommended as part of routine treatment for women with intermediate-risk or high-risk early-stage endometrial cancer with the aim of improving survival. The absolute benefit of external beam radiotherapy in preventing isolated local recurrence is small and is not without toxicity. Funding Medical Research Council, National Cancer Research Network, National Cancer Institute of Canada, with funds from the Canadian Cancer Society.
引用
收藏
页码:137 / 146
页数:10
相关论文
共 10 条
[1]  
AALDERS J, 1980, OBSTET GYNECOL, V56, P419
[2]  
ABE O, 1995, NEW ENGL J MED, V333, P1444
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2001, Systematic Reviews in Health Care: Meta-Analysis in Context
[4]   Surgery and postoperative radiotherapy versus surgery alone for patients with stage-1 endometrial carcinoma:: multicentre randomised trial [J].
Creutzberg, CL ;
van Putten, WLJ ;
Koper, PCM ;
Lybeert, MLM ;
Jobsen, JJ ;
Wárlám-Rodenhuis, CC ;
De Winter, KAJ ;
Lutgens, LCHW ;
van den Bergh, ACM ;
van de Steen-Banasik, E ;
Beerman, H ;
van Lent, M .
LANCET, 2000, 355 (9213) :1404-1411
[5]   A phase III trial of surgery with or without adjunctive external pelvic radiation therapy in intermediate risk endometrial adenocarcinoma: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study [J].
Keys, HM ;
Roberts, JA ;
Brunetto, VL ;
Zaino, RJ ;
Spirtos, NM ;
Bloss, JD ;
Pearlman, A ;
Maiman, MA ;
Bell, JG .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2004, 92 (03) :744-751
[6]   Adjuvant radiotherapy for stage I endometrial cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Kong, A. ;
Simera, I. ;
Collingwood, M. ;
Williams, C. ;
Kitchener, H. .
ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2007, 18 (10) :1595-1604
[7]  
*ROYAL COLL PATH, 2001, MIN DAT HIST REP AT
[8]   Flexible parametric proportional-hazards and proportional-odds models for censored survival data, with application to prognostic modelling and estimation of treatment effects [J].
Royston, P ;
Parmar, MKB .
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2002, 21 (15) :2175-2197
[9]   REVISED FIGO STAGING FOR GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER [J].
SHEPHERD, JH .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 1989, 96 (08) :889-892
[10]  
Soderini A, 2003, INT J GYNECOL CAN S1, V13, P78