Assessment of group versus individual diabetes education - A randomized study

被引:241
作者
Rickheim, PL [1 ]
Flader, JL [1 ]
Weaver, TW [1 ]
Kendall, DM [1 ]
机构
[1] Int Diabet Ctr, Pk Nicollet Inst, Minneapolis, MN 55416 USA
关键词
D O I
10.2337/diacare.25.2.269
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVES- The current study was conducted to compare the effectiveness of delivering diabetes education in either a group or individual setting using a consistent, evidence-based curriculum. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS- A total of 170 subjects with type 2 diabetes were randomly assigned to either group (n = 87) or individual (n = 83) educational settings. Subjects received education in four sequential sessions delivered at consistent time intervals over a 6-month period. Outcomes included changes in knowledge, self-management behaviors, weight, BM1, HbA(1c), health-related quality of life, patient attitudes, and medication regimen. Changes were assessed at baseline and after the 2-week, 3-month, and 6-month education sessions. RESULTS- Both educational settings had similar improvements in knowledge, BM1, health-related quality of life, attitudes, and all other measured indicators. HbA(1c) decreased from 8.5 - 11.8% at baseline to 6.5 +/- 0.8% at 6 months (P < 0.01) in the study population as a whole. Subjects assigned to the individual setting had a 1.7 +/- 1.9% reduction in HbA(1c) (P < 0.01), whereas subjects assigned to the group setting had a 2.5 +/- 1.8% reduction in HbA(1c) (P < 0.01). The difference in HbA(1c) improvement was marginally greater in subjects assigned to group education versus individualized education (P = 0.05). CONCLUSIONS - This study demonstrates that diabetes education delivered in a group setting, when compared with an individual setting, was equally effective at providing equivalent or slightly greater improvements in glycemic control. Group diabetes education was similarly effective in delivering key educational components and may allow for more efficient and cost-effective methods in the delivery of diabetes education programs.
引用
收藏
页码:269 / 274
页数:6
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1990, HLTH BEHAV HLTH ED T
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1995, CHANGING GOOD
[3]   Nurse case management to improve glycemic control in diabetic patients in a health maintenance organization - A randomized, controlled trial [J].
Aubert, RE ;
Herman, WH ;
Waters, J ;
Moore, W ;
Sutton, D ;
Peterson, BL ;
Bailey, CM ;
Koplan, JP .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1998, 129 (08) :605-+
[4]   EVALUATION OF A DIABETES SPECIALTY CENTER - STRUCTURE, PROCESS AND OUTCOME [J].
BASA, RP ;
MCLEOD, B .
PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 1995, 25 (01) :23-29
[5]  
Bergenstal RM, 2001, ENDOCRINOLOGY, P810
[6]   STUDIES OF EDUCATIONAL INTERVENTIONS AND OUTCOMES IN DIABETIC ADULTS - A METAANALYSIS REVISITED [J].
BROWN, SA .
PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 1990, 16 (03) :189-215
[7]   Interventions to promote diabetes self-management: State of the science [J].
Brown, SA .
DIABETES EDUCATOR, 1999, 25 (06) :52-61
[8]   THE ROLE OF DIET BEHAVIORS IN ACHIEVING IMPROVED GLYCEMIC CONTROL IN INTENSIVELY TREATED PATIENTS IN THE DIABETES CONTROL AND COMPLICATIONS TRIAL [J].
DELAHANTY, LM ;
HALFORD, BN .
DIABETES CARE, 1993, 16 (11) :1453-1458
[9]   COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF MEDICAL NUTRITION THERAPY PROVIDED BY DIETITIANS FOR PERSONS WITH NON-INSULIN-DEPENDENT DIABETES-MELLITUS [J].
FRANZ, MJ ;
SPLETT, PL ;
MONK, A ;
BARRY, B ;
MCCLAIN, K ;
WEAVER, T ;
UPHAM, P ;
BERGENSTAL, R ;
MAZZE, RS .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN DIETETIC ASSOCIATION, 1995, 95 (09) :1018-1024
[10]   National Health Expenditures in 1997: More slow growth [J].
Levit, K ;
Cowan, C ;
Braden, B ;
Stiller, J ;
Sensenig, A ;
Lazenby, H .
HEALTH AFFAIRS, 1998, 17 (06) :99-110