Data quality of surgery for carotid artery stenosis. Are the national vascular registries reliable?

被引:15
作者
Dahl, T
Rudjord, K
Altreuther, M
Myhre, HO [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Trondheim Hosp, St Olavs Hosp, Dept Surg, N-7006 Trondheim, Norway
[2] Norwegian Univ Sci & Technol, Dept Circulat & Med Imaging, N-7034 Trondheim, Norway
[3] SINTEF, Hlth Res, N-7034 Trondheim, Norway
关键词
carotid surgery; registries; coding; completeness;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejvs.2005.11.014
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objectives. To study completeness of reporting carotid endarterectomies, including peri-operative stroke and mortality rate, in a national vascular registry, NorKfar, and a national administrative registry, The Norwegian Patient Register (NPR). Design. Comparative registry-based national study. Materials. Member hospitals of NorKar, including 89% of carotid endarterectomies in Norway, were compared With relevant data hi NPR for the years 2000-2002. Methods. We compared procedure-codes, diagnosis-codes, in-hospital death and the occurrence of peri-operative stroke after treatment for carotid artery stenosis in the two registries to evaluate completeness. Results. Compared with the NPR numbers, 16% of carotid endarterectomies were missing in the reports from member hospitals of NorKar. Further, during this three-year period, there Was an under-reporting of seven strokes and two deaths. The discrepancy zoos most pronounced in 2001. Conclusions. There is an under-reporting of patients operated on for carotid artery stenosis in NorKar according to NPR numbers as well as an under-reporting of early deaths and strokes. There is a need for better quality data in the NorKar Registry. Registry quality would be likely to improve if patient identifiable data were available in both registries.
引用
收藏
页码:381 / 385
页数:5
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]  
Aardal Sidsel, 2005, Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen, V125, P903
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1998, INT STAT CLASS DIS R
[3]   Patients not included in medical audit have a worse outcome than those included [J].
Elfstrom, J ;
Stubberod, A ;
Troeng, T .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR QUALITY IN HEALTH CARE, 1996, 8 (02) :153-157
[4]   How to evaluate and improve the quality and credibility of an outcomes database: validation and feedback study on the UK Cardiac Surgery Experience [J].
Fine, LG ;
Keogh, BE ;
Cretin, S ;
Orlando, M ;
Gould, MM .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2003, 326 (7379) :25-28
[5]   Registration and validity of surgical complications in colorectal cancer surgery [J].
Gunnarsson, U ;
Seligsohn, E ;
Jestin, P ;
Påhlman, L .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2003, 90 (04) :454-459
[6]   Quality of data reported on abdominal aortic aneurysm repair -: A comparison between a national vascular and a national administrative registry [J].
Haug, ES ;
Romundstad, P ;
Sæther, OD ;
Jorgenvåg, R ;
Myhre, HO .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2005, 29 (06) :571-578
[7]  
*HLTH TECHN ASS, 2003, 8 HLTH TECHN ASS, P58
[8]   Vascular registries -: are they worth the effort? [J].
Jensen, LP ;
Troëng, T .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2000, 20 (03) :225-226
[9]   Auditing a nationwide vascular registry - The 4-year Finnvasc experience [J].
Kantonen, I ;
Lepantalo, M ;
Salenius, JP ;
Forsstrom, E ;
Hakkarainen, T ;
Huusari, H ;
Jaakkola, A ;
Kaarne, M ;
Kaartinen, P ;
Kivivuori, R ;
Kostiainen, S ;
Lehtonen, J ;
Loponen, P ;
Luther, M ;
Maenpaa, I ;
Nikula, P ;
Riekkinen, H ;
Rissanen, K ;
Vilkko, P ;
Ylonen, K .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY, 1997, 14 (06) :468-474
[10]   Accuracy of clinical data in a population based vascular registry [J].
Laustsen, J ;
Jensen, LP ;
Hansen, AK .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2004, 27 (02) :216-219