Use of the selective oral neuraminidase inhibitor oseltamivir to prevent influenza

被引:344
作者
Hayden, FG
Atmar, RL
Schilling, M
Johnson, C
Poretz, D
Paar, D
Huson, L
Ward, P
Mills, RG
机构
[1] Univ Virginia, Hlth Sci Ctr, Dept Microbiol, Charlottesville, VA 22908 USA
[2] Eastern Virginia Med Sch, Norfolk, VA 23501 USA
[3] Baylor Coll Med, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[4] Pharmaceut Res Associates, Lenexa, KS USA
[5] Univ Texas, Galveston, TX 77555 USA
[6] Infect Dis Physicians, Fairfax, VA USA
[7] Roche Global Dev, Welwyn Garden City, Herts, England
[8] Gilead Sci Inc, Foster City, CA 94404 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1056/NEJM199910283411802
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background Safe and effective antiviral agents are needed to prevent infection with influenza A and B viruses. Oseltamivir (GS4104), which can be administered orally, is the prodrug of GS4071, a potent and selective inhibitor of influenzavirus neuraminidases. We studied the use of oseltamivir for longterm prophylaxis against influenza in two placebo-controlled, double-blind trials at different U.S. sites during the winter of 1997-1998. Methods We randomly assigned 1559 healthy, nonimmunized adults 18 to 65 years old to receive either oral oseltamivir (75 mg given once or twice daily, for a total daily dose of 75 or 150 mg) or placebo for six weeks during a peak period of local influenzavirus activity. The primary end point with respect to efficacy was laboratory-confirmed influenza-like illness (defined as a temperature of at least 37.2 degrees C accompanied by at least one respiratory and at least one systemic symptom). Results In the two studies combined, the risk of influenza among subjects assigned to either once-daily or twice-daily oseltamivir (1.2 percent and 1.3 percent, respectively) was lower than that among subjects assigned to placebo (4.8 percent; P<0.001 and P=0.001 for the comparison with once-daily and twice-daily oseltamivir, respectively). The protective efficacy of oseltamivir in the two active-treatment groups combined was 74 percent (95 percent confidence interval, 53 to 88 percent) at all the sites combined and 82 percent (95 percent confidence interval, 60 to 93 percent) at sites in Virginia, where the rate of influenza infection was higher than the overall rate. For culture-proved influenza, the rate of protective efficacy in the two oseltamivir groups combined was 87 percent (95 percent confidence interval, 65 to 96 percent). The rate of laboratory-confirmed influenza infection was lower with oseltamivir than with placebo (5.3 percent vs. 10.6 percent, P<0.001). Oseltamivir was well tolerated but was associated with a greater frequency of nausea (12.1 percent and 14.6 percent in the once-daily and twice-daily groups, respectively) and vomiting (2.5 percent and 2.7 percent, respectively) than was placebo (nausea, 7.1 percent; vomiting, 0.8 percent). However, the frequency of premature discontinuation of drug or placebo was similar among the three groups (3.1 to 4.0 percent). Conclusions Oseltamivir administered daily for six weeks by the oral route is safe and effective for the prevention of influenza. (N Engl J Med 1999;341: 1336-43.) (C) 1999, Massachusetts Medical Society.
引用
收藏
页码:1336 / 1343
页数:8
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1998, MMWR Recomm Rep, V47, P1
[2]  
[Anonymous], 38 INT C ANT AG CHEM
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1993, Resampling-based multiple testing: Examples and methods for P-value adjustment
[4]   New approaches to influenza chemotherapy - Neuraminidase inhibitors [J].
Calfee, DP ;
Hayden, FG .
DRUGS, 1998, 56 (04) :537-553
[5]  
CALFEE DP, 1998, 38 ANN INT C ANT AG, P334
[6]  
Claas ECJ, 1998, LANCET, V351, P1292
[7]   A CONTROLLED TRIAL OF AMANTADINE AND RIMANTADINE IN THE PROPHYLAXIS OF INFLUENZA-A INFECTION [J].
DOLIN, R ;
REICHMAN, RC ;
MADORE, HP ;
MAYNARD, R ;
LINTON, PN ;
WEBBERJONES, J .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1982, 307 (10) :580-584
[8]  
DOUGLAS RG, 1990, NEW ENGL J MED, V322, P443, DOI 10.1056/NEJM199002153220706
[9]  
HAYDEN FG, 1996, ANTIVIRAL DRUG RESIS, P59
[10]  
Hayden Frederick G., 1997, Journal of Infectious Diseases, V176, pS56, DOI 10.1086/514177