Colonization of new habitats by benthic foraminifera: a review

被引:172
作者
Alve, E [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oslo, Dept Geol, N-0316 Oslo, Norway
关键词
benthic foraminifera; meiofauna; dispersal; colonization; succession; recovery;
D O I
10.1016/S0012-8252(99)00016-1
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 ;
摘要
Colonization of new habitats, which have been established as a result of a catastrophic disturbance of the environment, is one of the characteristic repetitive events throughout the Phanerozoic. In recent years, much attention has been paid to investigations focusing on biological recovery of benthic habitats severely disturbed by human activity. In order to improve our environmental and stratigraphical interpretations of such events, we need a more thorough understanding of the processes involved in colonization by one of the most abundant and useful fossil groups, the benthic foraminifera. The present review focuses on processes governing benthic foraminiferal dispersion and colonization patterns in modern environments. For benthic foraminifera, the only active dispersal mechanism is through self-locomotion on or within the sediment and this is considered to be efficient over short distances only. Several passive dispersal methods have been suggested but two seem to be of more general importance. These are dispersal through release and transport of embryonic juveniles and passive suspension and transport of various growth stages. Both are probably important for most benthic foraminifera but the former is likely to be the main mechanism for attached, tubular and larger foraminifera, which are not easily entrained at a later life stage. The latter seems to be a more important dispersion mechanism for benthic foraminifera than previously realized. The colonization rate of soft-bottom substrates is closely related to the hydraulic regime in, and the transit time from, the source area inhabited by species capable of colonizing the new habitat las long as food and other environmental characteristics are not limiting factors). The transit time depends on the speed of the transporting medium and the distance from the source area. There seems to be two end-processes which can operate during the colonization, depending on whether physically induced or biological processes are allowed to dominate. They are characterized by different colonization patterns. In high energy environments (bottom current velocities often > 20 cm/s), a short transit time may cause the major components of the nearest ambient seafloor assemblages to colonize the new habitat within days. In this case the colonization is simply through a physical transfer of parts of the source community to the new habitat, allowing no time for pioneer, opportunistic assemblages to develop. In low energy environments (bottom current velocities generally < 10 cm/s), the transit time is long for most species. Here, colonization follows the classic metazoan successional pattern with an initial, high abundance pioneer assemblage strongly dominated by small opportunists followed by development of assemblages with increasing numbers of specialized species and recovery can take from one to several years. Initial lack of food (e.g., volcanic ash) or 'hostile' substrate properties (e.g., recently reoxygenated or severely contaminated sediments) may delay colonization by months or even years. Small, infaunal species (both calcareous and agglutinated) are among the first and most successful colonizers of soft bottom habitats from shallow waters to the deep sea. Throchospiral agglutinated taxa are among the most abundant colonizers on deep sea hard substrates. (C) 1999 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:167 / 185
页数:19
相关论文
共 112 条
[31]   FORAMINIFERAL RESPONSE TO TRACE-METAL CONTAMINATION IN THE PATAPSCO RIVER AND BALTIMORE HARBOR, MARYLAND [J].
ELLISON, RL ;
BROOME, R ;
OGILVIE, R .
MARINE POLLUTION BULLETIN, 1986, 17 (09) :419-423
[32]   FORAMINIFERAL RECOLONIZATION ON THE CONTINENTAL-SHELF [J].
ELLISON, RL ;
PECK, GE .
JOURNAL OF FORAMINIFERAL RESEARCH, 1983, 13 (04) :231-241
[33]   POPULATION-DYNAMICS OF THE FORAMINIFERAN GLABRATELLA-ORNATISSIMA (CUSHMAN) IN NORTHERN CALIFORNIA [J].
ERSKIAN, MG ;
LIPPS, JH .
JOURNAL OF FORAMINIFERAL RESEARCH, 1987, 17 (03) :240-256
[34]   Vestimentiferan on a whale fall [J].
Feldman, RA ;
Shank, TM ;
Black, MB ;
Baco, AR ;
Smith, CR ;
Vrijenhoek, RC .
BIOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1998, 194 (02) :116-119
[35]  
FINGER K L, 1981, Micropaleontology (New York), V27, P111, DOI 10.2307/1485283
[36]  
FRANKEL L, 1972, J PALEONTOL, V46, P62
[37]   TAPHOFACIES IMPLICATIONS OF INFAUNAL FORAMINIFERAL ASSEMBLAGES IN A GEORGIA SALT-MARSH, SAPELO-ISLAND [J].
GOLDSTEIN, ST ;
HARBEN, EB .
MICROPALEONTOLOGY, 1993, 39 (01) :53-62
[38]   Gametogenesis and the antiquity of reproductive pattern in the Foraminiferida [J].
Goldstein, ST .
JOURNAL OF FORAMINIFERAL RESEARCH, 1997, 27 (04) :319-328
[39]   INFLUENCE OF SEASONALLY DEPOSITED PHYTODETRITUS ON BENTHIC FORAMINIFERAL POPULATIONS IN THE BATHYAL NORTHEAST ATLANTIC - THE SPECIES RESPONSE [J].
GOODAY, AJ ;
LAMBSHEAD, PJD .
MARINE ECOLOGY PROGRESS SERIES, 1989, 58 (1-2) :53-67
[40]   An apparent lack of response by metazoan meiofauna to phytodetritus deposition in the bathyal north-eastern Atlantic [J].
Gooday, AJ ;
Pfannkuche, O ;
Lambshead, PJD .
JOURNAL OF THE MARINE BIOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION OF THE UNITED KINGDOM, 1996, 76 (02) :297-310