Perioperative outcomes of the Prolift® pelvic floor repair systems following introduction to a urogynecology teaching service

被引:12
作者
Alperin, Marianna [1 ]
Sutkin, Gary [1 ]
Ellison, Rennique [1 ]
Meyn, Leslie [2 ]
Moalli, Pamela [1 ]
Zyczynki, Halina [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Pittsburgh, Magee Womens Hosp, Div Urogynecol, Ob Gyn, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
[2] Univ Pittsburgh, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
关键词
Vaginal mesh; Pelvic organ prolapse repair; Prolift (R); Perioperative morbidity;
D O I
10.1007/s00192-008-0704-x
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
The safety information of the vaginal mesh systems upon introduction to a teaching urogynecology service is limited to date. To determine the frequency of perioperative complications associated with the use of Prolift (R) kits (Gynecare/Ethicon, Somerville, NJ, USA) by a teaching urogynecology service, data from the first 100 consecutive women were analyzed. The primary outcome was any deviation from a normal intraoperative or perioperative course. Complications were graded using the Dindo morbidity scale. Univariate analyses were performed to identify risk factors. Complications included bladder perforation (2%), blood transfusion (2%), mesh exposure (4%), and urinary tract infections (28%). Eleven percent of women reported postoperative pain, and 34% required catheterization at discharge for incomplete bladder emptying. Univariate analysis showed no association between morbidities and patient characteristics, attending experience, or fellow involvement. The integration of Prolift (R) kits for prolapse repair into a urogynecology training program can be achieved with few perioperative complications.
引用
收藏
页码:1617 / 1622
页数:6
相关论文
共 14 条
  • [1] Short-term outcome after transvaginal mesh repair of pelvic organ prolapse
    Altman, Daniel
    Vayrynen, Tapio
    Engh, Marie Ellstrom
    Axelsen, Susanne
    Falconer, Christian
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2008, 19 (06) : 787 - 793
  • [2] Perioperative morbidity using transvaginal mesh in pelvic organ prolapse repair
    Altman, Daniel
    Falconer, Christian
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2007, 109 (02) : 303 - 308
  • [3] [Anonymous], MAN INSTR US GUID GY
  • [4] Vaginal versus abdominal reconstructive surgery for the treatment of pelvic support defects: A prospective randomized study with long-term outcome evaluation
    Benson, JT
    Lucente, V
    McClellan, E
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1996, 175 (06) : 1418 - 1421
  • [5] The standardization of terminology of female pelvic organ prolapse and pelvic floor dysfunction
    Bump, RC
    Mattiasson, A
    Bo, K
    Brubaker, LP
    DeLancey, JOL
    Klarskov, P
    Shull, BL
    Smith, ARB
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1996, 175 (01) : 10 - 17
  • [6] A randomized controlled trial comparing fascia lata and synthetic mesh for sacral colpopexy
    Culligan, P
    Blackwell, L
    Goldsmith, LJ
    Graham, CA
    Rogers, A
    Heit, MH
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2005, 106 (01) : 29 - 37
  • [7] Classification of surgical complications - A new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey
    Dindo, D
    Demartines, N
    Clavien, PA
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2004, 240 (02) : 205 - 213
  • [8] Abdominal colposacropexy and sacrospinous ligament suspension for severe uterovaginal prolapse: A comparison
    Lo, TS
    Wang, AC
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGIC SURGERY, 1998, 14 (02) : 59 - 64
  • [9] The role of apical vaginal support in the appearance of anterior and posterior vaginal prolapse
    Lowder, Jerry L.
    Park, Amy J.
    Ellison, Rennique
    Ghetti, Chiara
    Moalli, Pamela
    Zyczynski, Halina
    Weber, Anne M.
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2008, 111 (01) : 152 - 157
  • [10] Abdominal sacral colpopexy or vaginal sacrospinous colpopexy for vaginal vault prolapse: A prospective randomized study
    Maher, CF
    Qatawneh, AM
    Dwyer, PL
    Carey, MP
    Cornish, A
    Schluter, PJ
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2004, 190 (01) : 20 - 26