Can free energy calculations be fast and accurate at the same time? Binding of low-affinity, non-peptide inhibitors to the SH2 domain of the src protein

被引:46
作者
Chipot, C
Rozanska, X
Dixit, SB
机构
[1] Univ Henri Poincare, Inst Nanceien Chim Mol, UMR CNRS, UHP 7565, F-54506 Vandoeuvre Les Nancy, France
[2] Humboldt Univ, Inst Chem, Berlin, Germany
[3] Wesleyan Univ, Middletown, CT 06459 USA
关键词
free-energy calculations; molecular dynamics simulations; rational drug design;
D O I
10.1007/s10822-005-9021-3
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
The usefulness of free-energy calculations in non-academic environments, in general, and in the pharmaceutical industry, in particular, is a long-time debated issue, often considered from the angle of cost/performance criteria. In the context of the rational drug design of low-affinity, non-peptide inhibitors to the SH2 domain of the (pp60)supercript stopsrc tyrosine kinase, the continuing difficulties encountered in an attempt to obtain accurate free-energy estimates are addressed. free-energy calculations can provide a convincing answer, assuming that two key-requirements are fulfilled: (i) thorough sampling of the configurational space is necessary to minimize the statistical error, hence raising the question: to which extent can we sacrifice the computational effort, yet without jeopardizing the precision of the free-energy calculation? (ii) the sensitivity of binding free-energies to the parameters utilized imposes an appropriate parametrization of the potential energy function, especially for non-peptide molecules that are usually poorly described by multipurpose macromolecular force fields. Employing the free-energy perturbation method, accurate ranking, within +/- 0.7 kcal/mol, is obtained in the case of four non-peptide mimes of a sequence recognized by the (pp60)supercript stopsrc SH2 domain.
引用
收藏
页码:765 / 770
页数:6
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]  
Bhandarkar M, 2003, NAMD USERS GUIDE VER
[2]  
Brandsdal BO, 2003, ADV PROTEIN CHEM, V66, P123
[3]   Rational determination of charge distributions for free energy calculations [J].
Chipot, C .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL CHEMISTRY, 2003, 24 (04) :409-415
[4]   PARTICLE MESH EWALD - AN N.LOG(N) METHOD FOR EWALD SUMS IN LARGE SYSTEMS [J].
DARDEN, T ;
YORK, D ;
PEDERSEN, L .
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS, 1993, 98 (12) :10089-10092
[5]   A SMOOTH PARTICLE MESH EWALD METHOD [J].
ESSMANN, U ;
PERERA, L ;
BERKOWITZ, ML ;
DARDEN, T ;
LEE, H ;
PEDERSEN, LG .
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS, 1995, 103 (19) :8577-8593
[6]   CONSTANT-PRESSURE MOLECULAR-DYNAMICS SIMULATION - THE LANGEVIN PISTON METHOD [J].
FELLER, SE ;
ZHANG, YH ;
PASTOR, RW ;
BROOKS, BR .
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS, 1995, 103 (11) :4613-4621
[7]   HIDDEN THERMODYNAMICS OF MUTANT PROTEINS - A MOLECULAR-DYNAMICS ANALYSIS [J].
GAO, J ;
KUCZERA, K ;
TIDOR, B ;
KARPLUS, M .
SCIENCE, 1989, 244 (4908) :1069-1072
[8]   Insights into the recognition and association of transmembrane α-helices.: The free energy of α-helix dimerization in glycophorin A [J].
Hénin, J ;
Pohorille, A ;
Chipot, C .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2005, 127 (23) :8478-8484
[9]   COMPARISON OF SIMPLE POTENTIAL FUNCTIONS FOR SIMULATING LIQUID WATER [J].
JORGENSEN, WL ;
CHANDRASEKHAR, J ;
MADURA, JD ;
IMPEY, RW ;
KLEIN, ML .
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS, 1983, 79 (02) :926-935
[10]   NAMD2:: Greater scalability for parallel molecular dynamics [J].
Kalé, L ;
Skeel, R ;
Bhandarkar, M ;
Brunner, R ;
Gursoy, A ;
Krawetz, N ;
Phillips, J ;
Shinozaki, A ;
Varadarajan, K ;
Schulten, K .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL PHYSICS, 1999, 151 (01) :283-312