An intercomparison of cloud-resolving models with the atmospheric radiation measurement summer 1997 intensive observation period data

被引:171
作者
Xu, KM
Cederwall, RT
Donner, LJ
Grabowski, WW
Guichard, F
Johnson, DE
Khairoutdinov, M
Krueger, SK
Petch, JC
Randall, DA
Seman, CJ
Tao, WK
Wang, DH
Xie, SC
Yio, JJ
Zhang, MH
机构
[1] NASA, Langley Res Ctr, Hampton, VA 23681 USA
[2] Lawrence Livermore Natl Lab, Livermore, CA USA
[3] NOAA, Geophys Fluid Dynam Lab, Silver Spring, MD 20910 USA
[4] Natl Ctr Atmospher Res, Boulder, CO 80307 USA
[5] Ctr Natl Rech Meteorol, Greenbelt, MD 20771 USA
[6] Colorado State Univ, Ft Collins, CO 80523 USA
[7] Univ Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112 USA
[8] Met Off, Bracknell, Berks, England
[9] Hampton Univ, Hampton, VA 23668 USA
[10] SUNY, New York, NY USA
关键词
continental cumulus convection; model intercomparison study;
D O I
10.1256/003590002321042117
中图分类号
P4 [大气科学(气象学)];
学科分类号
0706 ; 070601 ;
摘要
This paper reports an intercomparison study of midlatitude continental cumulus convection simulated by eight two-dimensional and two three-dimensional cloud-resolving models (CRMs), driven by observed large-scale advective temperature and moisture tendencies, surface turbulent fluxes, and radiative-heating profiles during three sub-periods of the summer 1997 Intensive Observation Period of the US Department of Energy's Atmospheric Radiation Measurement (ARM) program, Each sub-period includes two or three precipitation events of various intensities over a span of 4 or 5 days, The results can be summarized as follows. CRMs can reasonably simulate midlatitude continental summer convection observed at the ARM Cloud and Radiation Testbed site in terms of the intensity of convective activity, and the temperature and specific-humidity evolution. Delayed occurrences of the initial precipitation events are a common feature for all three sub-cases among the models. Cloud mass fluxes, condensate mixing ratios and hydrometeor fractions produced by all CRMs are similar. Some of the simulated cloud properties such as cloud liquid-water path and hydrometeor fraction are rather similar to available observations. All CRMs produce large downdraught mass fluxes with magnitudes similar to those of updraughts, in contrast to CRM results for tropical convection. Some inter-model differences in cloud properties are likely to be related to those in the parametrizations of microphysical processes. There is generally a good agreement between the CRMs and observations with CRMs being significantly better than single-column models (SCMs), suggesting that current results are suitable for use in improving parametrizations in SCMs. However, improvements can still be made in the CRM simulations; these include the proper initialization of the CRMs and a more proper method of diagnosing cloud boundaries in model outputs for comparison with satellite and radar cloud observations.
引用
收藏
页码:593 / 624
页数:32
相关论文
共 103 条
[1]   A GCSS model intercomparison for a tropical squall line observed during TOGA-COARE. II: Intercomparison of single-column models and a cloud-resolving model [J].
Bechtold, P ;
Redelsperger, JL ;
Beau, I ;
Blackburn, M ;
Brinkop, S ;
Grandpeix, JY ;
Grant, A ;
Gregory, D ;
Guichard, F ;
Hoff, C ;
Ioannidou, E .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL METEOROLOGICAL SOCIETY, 2000, 126 (564) :865-888
[2]  
BOYLE JD, 2000, MON WEATHER REV, V128, P901
[3]   LARGE-EDDY SIMULATION OF STABLE ATMOSPHERIC BOUNDARY-LAYERS WITH A REVISED STOCHASTIC SUBGRID MODEL [J].
BROWN, AR ;
DERBYSHIRE, SH ;
MASON, PJ .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL METEOROLOGICAL SOCIETY, 1994, 120 (520) :1485-1512
[4]  
BROWNING KA, 1994, IGPO PUBLICATION SER, V11
[5]  
CAHALAN RF, 1995, J ATMOS SCI, V52, P3002, DOI 10.1175/1520-0469(1995)052<3002:LWPAPP>2.0.CO
[6]  
2
[7]  
CANIAUX G, 1994, J ATMOS SCI, V51, P2046, DOI 10.1175/1520-0469(1994)051<2046:ANSOTS>2.0.CO
[8]  
2
[9]   INTERPRETATION OF CLOUD-CLIMATE FEEDBACK AS PRODUCED BY 14 ATMOSPHERIC GENERAL-CIRCULATION MODELS [J].
CESS, RD ;
POTTER, GL ;
BLANCHET, JP ;
BOER, GJ ;
GHAN, SJ ;
KIEHL, JT ;
LETREUT, H ;
LI, ZX ;
LIANG, XZ ;
MITCHELL, JFB ;
MORCRETTE, JJ ;
RANDALL, DA ;
RICHES, MR ;
ROECKNER, E ;
SCHLESE, U ;
SLINGO, A ;
TAYLOR, KE ;
WASHINGTON, WM ;
WETHERALD, RT ;
YAGAI, I .
SCIENCE, 1989, 245 (4917) :513-516
[10]  
Clothiaux EE, 1999, J ATMOS OCEAN TECH, V16, P819, DOI 10.1175/1520-0426(1999)016<0819:TARMPC>2.0.CO