Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, Cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors and paracetamol use in Queensland and in the whole of Australia

被引:8
作者
Barozzi, Nadia [1 ]
Tett, Susan E. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Queensland, Sch Pharm, Brisbane, Qld 4072, Australia
[2] Univ Queensland, Royal Brisbane & Womens Hosp, Fac Hlth Sci, Herston, Qld 4029, Australia
关键词
D O I
10.1186/1472-6963-8-196
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Cross national drug utilization studies can provide information about different influences on physician prescribing. This is important for medicines with issues around safety and quality of use, like non selective non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (ns-NSAIDs) and cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) inhibitors. To enable comparison of prescription medicine use across different jurisdictions with a range of population sizes, data first need to be compared within Australia to understand whether use in a smaller sub-population may be considered as representative of the total use within Australia. The aim of this study was to compare the utilization of non selective NSAID, COX-2 inhibitors and paracetamol between Queensland and Australia. Method: Dispensing data were obtained for concession beneficiaries for Australia for ns-NSAIDs, COX-2 inhibitors and paracetamol subsidized by the PBS over the period 1997-2003. The same data were purchased for Queensland. Data were converted to Defined Daily Dose (DDD)/1000 beneficiaries/day (World Health Organization anatomical therapeutic chemical classification, 2005). Results: Total NSAID and paracetamol consumption were similar in Australia and Queensland. Ns-NSAID use decreased sharply with the introduction of COX-2 inhibitors (from approximately 80 to 40 DDD/1000 beneficiaries/day). Paracetamol was constant (approximately 45 DDD/1000 beneficiaries/day). COX-2 inhibitors consumption was initially higher in Queensland than in the whole of Australia. Conclusion: Despite initial divergence in celecoxib use between Queensland and Australia, the use of ns-NSAIDs, COX-2 inhibitors and paracetamol overall, in concession beneficiaries, was comparable in Australia and Queensland.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]  
Anderson G M, 1997, J Eval Clin Pract, V3, P283, DOI 10.1046/j.1365-2753.1997.t01-1-00005.x
[2]  
*AUST BUR STAT, 2006, POPU PROJ AUST
[3]  
*AUST GOV DEP HLTH, 2006, NAT SERV IMPR FRAM O
[4]  
*AUST I HLTH WELF, 2006, 73 AIHW
[5]  
*AUST SOC CLIN EXP, AUST MED HDB 2005
[6]   What happened to the prescribing of other COX-2 inhibitors, paracetamol and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs when rofecoxib was withdrawn in Australia? [J].
Barozzi, Nadia ;
Tett, Susan E. .
PHARMACOEPIDEMIOLOGY AND DRUG SAFETY, 2007, 16 (11) :1184-1191
[7]   Motivations and perceived influences on rural and urban general practitioners when prescribing conventional non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs or COX-2 inhibitors [J].
Behan, K ;
Cutts, C ;
Tett, SE .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACY AND THERAPEUTICS, 2005, 30 (04) :337-343
[8]   Uptake of new drugs in rural and urban areas of Queensland, Australia: the example of COX-2 inhibitors [J].
Behan, K ;
Cutts, C ;
Tett, SE .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2005, 61 (01) :55-58
[9]   Drug utilization 90% -: a simple method for assessing the quality of drug prescribing [J].
Bergman, U ;
Popa, C ;
Tomson, Y ;
Wettermark, B ;
Einarson, TR ;
Åberg, H ;
Sjöqvist, F .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 1998, 54 (02) :113-118
[10]  
BROWN L, 2003, INT S EC, P169