Water deficits and hydraulic limits to leaf water supply

被引:622
作者
Sperry, JS [1 ]
Hacke, UG
Oren, R
Comstock, JP
机构
[1] Univ Utah, Dept Biol, Salt Lake City, UT 84112 USA
[2] Duke Univ, Nicholas Sch Environm, Durham, NC 27708 USA
[3] Cornell Univ, Boyce Thompson Inst Plant Res, Ithaca, NY 14853 USA
关键词
drought responses; hydraulic architecture; plant-soil interactions; stomatal regulation; water relations; water transport; xylem cavitation;
D O I
10.1046/j.0016-8025.2001.00799.x
中图分类号
Q94 [植物学];
学科分类号
071001 ;
摘要
Many aspects of plant water use - particularly in response to soil drought - may have as their basis the alteration of hydraulic conductance from soil to canopy. The regulation of plant water potential (IF) by stomatal control and leaf area adjustment may be necessary to maximize water uptake on the one hand, while avoiding loss of hydraulic contact with the soil water on the other. Modelling the changes in hydraulic conductance with pressure gradients in the continuum allows the prediction of water use as a function of soil environment and plant architectural an xylem traits. Large differences in water use between species can be attributed in part to differences in their 'hydraulic equipment' that is presumably optimized for drawing water from a particular temporal and spatial niche in the soil environment. A number of studies have identified hydraulic limits as the cause of partial or complete foliar dieback in response to drought. The interactions between root:shoot ratio, rooting depth, xylem properties, and soil properties in influencing the limits to canopy water supply can be used to predict which combinations should optimize water use in a given circumstance. The hydraulic approach can improve our understanding of the coupling of canopy processes to soil environment, and the adaptive significance of stomatal behaviour.
引用
收藏
页码:251 / 263
页数:13
相关论文
共 110 条
[1]  
Albaugh TJ, 1998, FOREST SCI, V44, P317
[2]   Root and stem xylem embolism, stomatal conductance, and leaf turgor in Acer grandidentatum populations along a soil moisture gradient [J].
Alder, NN ;
Sperry, JS ;
Pockman, WT .
OECOLOGIA, 1996, 105 (03) :293-301
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1979, WATER FLOW IN PLANTS
[4]   COMPARATIVE RESISTANCE OF THE SOIL AND THE PLANT TO WATER TRANSPORT [J].
BLIZZARD, WE ;
BOYER, JS .
PLANT PHYSIOLOGY, 1980, 66 (05) :809-814
[5]  
Bond BJ, 1999, TREE PHYSIOL, V19, P503
[6]   THE REFILLING OF EMBOLIZED XYLEM IN PINUS-SYLVESTRIS L [J].
BORGHETTI, M ;
EDWARDS, WRN ;
GRACE, J ;
JARVIS, PG ;
RASCHI, A .
PLANT CELL AND ENVIRONMENT, 1991, 14 (04) :357-369
[7]   THE EFFECTS OF TEXTURE ON THE RESISTANCE TO WATER-MOVEMENT WITHIN THE RHIZOSPHERE [J].
BRISTOW, KL ;
CAMPBELL, GS ;
CALISSENDORFF, C .
SOIL SCIENCE SOCIETY OF AMERICA JOURNAL, 1984, 48 (02) :266-270
[8]   The importance of xylem constraints in the distribution of conifer species [J].
Brodribb, T ;
Hill, RS .
NEW PHYTOLOGIST, 1999, 143 (02) :365-372
[9]  
Caldwell M. M., 1986, On the economy of plant form and function, P251
[10]   BIOPHYSICAL MODEL OF XYLEM CONDUCTANCE IN TRACHEIDS OF THE FERN PTERIS-VITTATA [J].
CALKIN, HW ;
GIBSON, AC ;
NOBEL, PS .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL BOTANY, 1986, 37 (180) :1054-1064