Examining spatially varying relationships between land use and water quality using geographically weighted regression I: Model design and evaluation

被引:306
作者
Tu, Jun [1 ,2 ]
Xia, Zong-Guo [3 ]
机构
[1] Kennesaw State Univ, Dept Geog & Anthropol, Kennesaw, GA 30144 USA
[2] Kennesaw State Univ, Interdisciplinary Program Environm Studies, Kennesaw, GA 30144 USA
[3] Univ Massachusetts Dartmouth, N Dartmouth, MA 02747 USA
关键词
Geographically weighted regression; Spatial non-stationarity; Spatial autocorrelation; Land use; Water quality;
D O I
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2008.09.031
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Traditional regression techniques such as ordinary least squares (OLS) can hide important local variations in the model parameters, and are not able to deal with spatial autocorrelations existing in the variables. A recently developed technique, geographically weighted regression (GWR), is used to examine the relationships between land use and water quality in eastern Massachusetts, USA. GWR models make great improvements of model performance over OLS models, which is proved by F-test and comparisons of model R(2) and corrected Akaike Information Criterion (AIC(c)) from both GWR and OLS. GWR models also improve the reliabilities of the relationships by reducing spatial autocorrelations. The application of GWR models finds that the relationships between land use and water quality are not constant over space but show great spatial non-stationarity. GWR models are able to reveal the information previously ignored by OLS models on the local causes of water pollution, and so improve the model ability to explain local situation of water quality. The results of this study suggest that GWR technique has the potential to serve as a useful tool for environmental research and management at watershed, regional, national and even global scales. (C) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:358 / 378
页数:21
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], [No title captured]
[2]  
[Anonymous], MIDDLE STATES GEOGR
[3]   GeoDa:: An introduction to spatial data analysis [J].
Anselin, L ;
Syabri, I ;
Kho, Y .
GEOGRAPHICAL ANALYSIS, 2006, 38 (01) :5-22
[4]   Relationships between landscape characteristics and nonpoint source pollutio2 inputs to coastal estuaries [J].
Basnyat P. ;
Teeter L.D. ;
Flynn K.M. ;
Lockaby B.G. .
Environmental Management, 1999, 23 (4) :539-549
[5]  
BRUNSDON C, 1998, STATISTICIAN, V47, P431
[6]   Estimating local car ownership models [J].
Clark, Stephen D. .
JOURNAL OF TRANSPORT GEOGRAPHY, 2007, 15 (03) :184-197
[7]   Specific conductance and pH as indicators of watershed disturbance in streams of the New Jersey Pinelands, USA [J].
Dow, CL ;
Zampella, RA .
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2000, 26 (04) :437-445
[8]   Exploring the spatial variation of food poverty in Ecuador [J].
Farrow, A ;
Larrea, C ;
Hyman, G ;
Lema, G .
FOOD POLICY, 2005, 30 (5-6) :510-531
[9]  
Fotheringham A.S., 2001, Geographical and Environmental Modelling, V5, P43
[10]  
Fotheringham A. S., 2002, Geographically Weighted Regression: The Analysis of Spatially Varying Relationships