A comparative evaluation of flood mitigation alternatives using GIS-based river hydraulics modelling and multicriteria decision analysis

被引:37
作者
Ghanbarpour, M. R. [1 ]
Salimi, S. [2 ]
Hipel, K. W. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Saskatchewan, Global Inst Water Secur, Saskatoon, SK S7H 1A4, Canada
[2] Univ Mazandaran, Fac Nat Resources, Sari, Iran
[3] Univ Waterloo, Dept Syst Design Engn, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, Canada
来源
JOURNAL OF FLOOD RISK MANAGEMENT | 2013年 / 6卷 / 04期
关键词
Decision analysis; flood mitigation; flood plain; HEC-RAS; TOPSIS; DOWNSTREAM; MANAGEMENT; LEVEL;
D O I
10.1111/jfr3.12017
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
A multicriteria framework is developed for the selection of optimal flood mitigation and river training measures in a selected reach of Zaremroud River in Northern Iran. A river model, Hydrologic Engineering Center River Analysis System, combined with geographic information system analysis is used to simulate water levels for steady, gradually varied flow and mapping inundated flood extents. The modelling is performed for four different alternatives, considering various channel modifications with different dimensions and levee construction. Flood inundation area, flood level, flow velocity and stream power on the downstream and outside of the river bend are used as decision criteria for each alternative. Economic analysis is conducted to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of each alternative. The decision analysis method, technique for order of preference by similarity to ideal solution, is used to compare different flood hazard mitigation measures based on risk, and environmental and economic impacts criteria. The findings of the analysis are that a levee construction at the right side of the river bank adjacent to the residential area is superior to the other three alternatives, which is confirmed using a scenario analysis of different flood mitigation measures.
引用
收藏
页码:319 / 331
页数:13
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2004, Reducing Disaster Risk: A Challenge for Development, P146
[2]   Multicriteria evaluation of flood control measures: The case of Ribeira do Livramento [J].
Bana E Costa, CA ;
da Silva, PA ;
Correia, FN .
WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT, 2004, 18 (03) :263-283
[3]   Towards a coherent philosophy for modelling the environment [J].
Beven, K .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY A-MATHEMATICAL PHYSICAL AND ENGINEERING SCIENCES, 2002, 458 (2026) :2465-2484
[4]   RIVER CHANNEL ADJUSTMENTS DOWNSTREAM FROM CHANNELIZATION WORKS IN ENGLAND AND WALES [J].
BROOKES, A .
EARTH SURFACE PROCESSES AND LANDFORMS, 1987, 12 (04) :337-351
[5]   What is responsible for increasing flood risks? The case of Gangwon Province, Korea [J].
Chang, Heejun ;
Franczyk, Jon ;
Kim, Changhwan .
NATURAL HAZARDS, 2009, 48 (03) :339-354
[6]  
Chen S.J., 1992, Fuzzy Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications, V1, P536
[7]  
Chow V. T., 1959, Open-channel Hydraulics
[8]   Floodplain management in urban developing areas. Part II. GIS-based flood analysis and urban growth modelling [J].
Correia, FN ;
Saraiva, MD ;
Da Silva, FN ;
Ramos, I .
WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT, 1999, 13 (01) :23-37
[9]  
Deputy of Technical Affairs (DTA), 2009, 10086952 DTA NAT DEP, P146
[10]  
Dilley M, 2005, DISAST RISK MANAGE, P1