Rules for stating when a limiting value is exceeded

被引:18
作者
Christensen, JM
Holst, E
Olsen, E
Wilrich, PT
机构
[1] Natl Environm Res Inst, Dept Environm Chem, DK-4000 Roskilde, Denmark
[2] Natl Inst Occupat Hlth, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
[3] Free Univ Berlin, Inst Stat & Okonometrie, D-1000 Berlin, Germany
关键词
conformity testing; compliance testing; limiting values; uncertainty of measurements; harmonization;
D O I
10.1007/s00769-001-0400-8
中图分类号
O65 [分析化学];
学科分类号
070302 ; 081704 ;
摘要
The paper describes rules for stating whether a measurement result indicates that the value of the measurand, e.g. the concentration of a substance in the blood, is in conformity or not in conformity with given specifications. Examples of the intended applications are control of doping in sports, alcohol level in drivers' blood, trace metals levels in workers' blood, the proportion of gold in alloys, certain ingredients in food products and pesticides in drinking water. When limiting value(s) have been established a permissible measurand value is said to be in conformity and a non-permissible value it is said to be in non-conformity. One of the following three statements is asserted: Statement A: The value of the measurand is beyond any reasonable doubt in conformity, Statement B: The value of the measurand is beyond any reasonable doubt in non-conformity, Statement C: Neither conformity nor non-conformity could be demonstrated. The test can be performed as either a one-stage or a two-stage procedure. A two-stage procedure is recommended as especially appropriate when a cheap and fast screening method can be used in the first stage. For normally distributed measurements, a freeware computer program, conform l e.exe, is available for the calculations of the probabilities for Statements A, B and C.
引用
收藏
页码:28 / 35
页数:8
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]  
*ACGIH, 2000, AM C GOV IND HYG ACG
[2]   HUMAN EXPOSURE TO TOXIC METALS - FACTORS INFLUENCING INTERPRETATION OF BIOMONITORING RESULTS [J].
CHRISTENSEN, JM .
SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 1995, 166 (1-3) :89-135
[3]   Uncertainty of measurement and legislative limits [J].
Desimoni, E ;
Mannino, S .
ACCREDITATION AND QUALITY ASSURANCE, 1998, 3 (08) :335-337
[4]  
*DFG, 2000, DTSCH FORSCH COMM IN
[5]  
*DIPPR, 1999, DAT COMP PUR COMP PR
[6]  
*EURACHEM, 2000, QUANT CERT AN MEAS
[8]   A practical guide to analytical method validation [J].
Green, JM .
ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY, 1996, 68 (09) :A305-A309
[9]   Background to the ADI/TDI/PTWI [J].
Herrman, JL ;
Younes, M .
REGULATORY TOXICOLOGY AND PHARMACOLOGY, 1999, 30 (02) :S109-S113
[10]  
HOLST E, 2001, IN PRESS INT STAT RE