Aerosol indirect effect studies at Southern Great Plains during the May 2003 Intensive Operations Period

被引:53
作者
Feingold, G
Furrer, R
Pilewskie, P
Remer, LA
Min, QL
Jonsson, H
机构
[1] NOAA, Environm Technol Lab, Boulder, CO 80305 USA
[2] Natl Ctr Atmospher Res, Boulder, CO 80307 USA
[3] Univ Colorado, Atmospher & Space Phys Lab, Programm Atmospher & Ocean Sci, Boulder, CO 80309 USA
[4] NASA, Goddard Space Flight Ctr, Greenbelt, MD 20771 USA
[5] SUNY Albany, Atmospher Sci Res Ctr, Albany, NY 12203 USA
[6] USN, Postgrad Sch, Ctr Disciplinary Remotely Piloted Aircraft Studie, Monterey, CA 93933 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1029/2004JD005648
中图分类号
P4 [大气科学(气象学)];
学科分类号
0706 ; 070601 ;
摘要
During May 2003 the Department of Energy's Atmospheric Radiation Measurement Program conducted an Intensive Operations Period (IOP) to measure the radiative effects of aerosol and clouds. A suite of both in situ and remote sensing measurements were available to measure aerosol and cloud parameters. This paper has three main goals: First, it focuses on comparison between in situ retrievals of the radiatively important drop effective radius r(e) and various satellite, airborne, and surface remote sensing retrievals of the same parameter. On 17 May 2003, there was a fortuitous, near-simultaneous sampling of a stratus cloud by five different methods. The retrievals of r(e) agree with one another to within similar to 20%, which is approximately the error estimate for most methods. Second, a methodology for deriving a best estimate of r(e) from these different instruments, with their different physical properties and sampling volumes, is proposed and applied to the 17 May event. Third, the paper examines the response of r(e) to changes in aerosol on 3 days during the experiment and examines the consistency of remote sensing and in situ measurements of the effect of aerosol on r(e). It is shown that in spite of the generally good agreement in derived r(e), the magnitude of the response of r(e) to changes in aerosol is quite sensitive to the method of retrieving r(e) and to the aerosol proxy for cloud condensation nuclei. Nonphysical responses are sometimes noted, and it is suggested that further work needs to be done to refine these techniques.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 55 条
[1]   AEROSOLS, CLOUD MICROPHYSICS, AND FRACTIONAL CLOUDINESS [J].
ALBRECHT, BA .
SCIENCE, 1989, 245 (4923) :1227-1230
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1993, J AGR BIOL ENVIR ST
[3]  
BARNARD JC, 2001, 11 ATM RAD MEAS SCI
[4]   The cloud, aerosol and precipitation spectrometer: a new instrument for cloud investigations [J].
Baumgardner, D ;
Jonsson, H ;
Dawson, W ;
O'Connor, D ;
Newton, R .
ATMOSPHERIC RESEARCH, 2001, 59 :251-264
[5]   Estimates of the spectral aerosol single scattering albedo and aerosol radiative effects during SAFARI 2000 [J].
Bergstrom, RW ;
Pilewskie, P ;
Schmid, B ;
Russell, PB .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 2003, 108 (D13)
[6]   An overview of the ACE-2 CLOUDYCOLUMN closure experiment [J].
Brenguier, JL ;
Chuang, PY ;
Fouquart, Y ;
Johnson, DW ;
Parol, F ;
Pawlowska, H ;
Pelon, J ;
Schüller, L ;
Schröder, F ;
Snider, J .
TELLUS SERIES B-CHEMICAL AND PHYSICAL METEOROLOGY, 2000, 52 (02) :815-827
[7]   Aerosol effect on cloud droplet size monitored from satellite [J].
Bréon, FM ;
Tanré, D ;
Generoso, S .
SCIENCE, 2002, 295 (5556) :834-838
[8]  
Durkee PA, 2000, J ATMOS SCI, V57, P2523, DOI 10.1175/1520-0469(2000)057<2523:TMASTE>2.0.CO
[9]  
2
[10]   Modeling of the first indirect effect: Analysis of measurement requirements [J].
Feingold, G .
GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2003, 30 (19) :ASC7-1