Evaluation of potential confounders in planning a study of occupational magnetic field exposure and female breast cancer

被引:9
作者
Goodman, M
Kelsh, M
Ebi, K
Iannuzzi, J
Langholz, B
机构
[1] Exponent Hlth Grp, Alexandria, VA 22314 USA
[2] Exponent Hlth Grp, Menlo Pk, CA USA
[3] Univ So Calif, Sch Med, Los Angeles, CA USA
[4] EPRI, Palo Alto, CA USA
关键词
breast neoplasms; confounding; methodology; risk factors; magnetic fields; gender;
D O I
10.1097/00001648-200201000-00009
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
We examined potential confounding factors that, if unaccounted for, could possibly produce a spurious association in a study of breast cancer among women occupationally exposed to magnetic fields. For each risk factor, we estimated strength of association, prevalence in the general population, and prevalence of the risk factor in the exposed group required to explain completely hypothetical odds ratios between occupational exposure to magnetic fields and breast cancer. We performed similar analyses for two, three, four, and five confounding factors acting simultaneously. Factors numerically capable of substantial confounding included obesity, continent of birth, family history of breast cancer in a first-degree relative, densities on the mammogram, benign proliferative breast disease, history of cancer in one breast, and consumption of at least two alcoholic drinks per day. Nevertheless, only continent of birth, history, of Lancer, obesity, and consumption of alcohol could potentially be related to occupation. Uncontrolled confounders', either alone or in combination, could possibly account for odds ratios in the 1.2-1.3 range but were very unlikely to produce an odds ratio of more than 1.5. A spurious negative association between magnetic fields and breast cancer could occur if the exposed group included a large number of immigrants from Asia and Africa.
引用
收藏
页码:50 / 58
页数:9
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]   ASPECTS OF MISCLASSIFICATION OF CONFOUNDING FACTORS [J].
AHLBOM, A ;
STEINECK, G .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL MEDICINE, 1992, 21 (01) :107-112
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1995, WEIGH OPT CRIT EV WE
[3]  
Atkinson C, 1999, CANCER EPIDEM BIOMAR, V8, P863
[4]  
BRESLOW NE, 1980, IARC SCI PUBL, V32, P93
[5]   MENSTRUAL FACTORS AND RISK OF BREAST-CANCER [J].
BRINTON, LA ;
SCHAIRER, C ;
HOOVER, RN ;
FRAUMENI, JF .
CANCER INVESTIGATION, 1988, 6 (03) :245-254
[6]  
Broeders M J, 1997, Q J Nucl Med, V41, P179
[7]   MAMMOGRAPHIC FEATURES AND BREAST-CANCER RISK - EFFECTS WITH TIME, AGE, AND MENOPAUSE STATUS [J].
BYRNE, C ;
SCHAIRER, C ;
WOLFE, J ;
PAREKH, N ;
SALANE, M ;
BRINTON, LA ;
HOOVER, R ;
HAILE, R .
JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 1995, 87 (21) :1622-1629
[8]   BREAST-CANCER MORTALITY AMONG FEMALE ELECTRICAL WORKERS IN THE UNITED-STATES [J].
CANTOR, KP ;
DOSEMECI, M ;
BRINTON, LA ;
STEWART, PA .
JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 1995, 87 (03) :227-228
[9]  
CARLILE T, 1985, JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC, V254, P1050
[10]  
Chen Y, 1999, CANCER EPIDEM BIOMAR, V8, P855