Toward a Field of Intersectionality Studies: Theory, Applications, and Praxis

被引:1967
作者
Cho, Sumi [1 ]
Crenshaw, Kimberle Williams [2 ,3 ]
McCall, Leslie [4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Depaul Univ, Coll Law, Chicago, IL 60604 USA
[2] Calif State Univ Los Angeles, Sch Law, Los Angeles, CA 90032 USA
[3] Columbia Univ, New York, NY 10027 USA
[4] Northwestern Univ, Dept Sociol, Dept Polit Sci, Evanston, IL 60208 USA
[5] Northwestern Univ, Inst Policy Res, Evanston, IL 60208 USA
来源
SIGNS | 2013年 / 38卷 / 04期
关键词
FEMINIST; POLITICS; DISADVANTAGES; INVISIBILITY; COMPLEXITY; CRITIQUE; RACE;
D O I
10.1086/669608
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
Intersectional insights and frameworks are put into practice in a multitude of highly contested, complex, and unpredictable ways. We group such engagements with intersectionality into three loosely defined sets of practices: applications of an intersectional framework or investigations of intersectional dynamics; debates about the scope and content of intersectionality as a theoretical and methodological paradigm; and political interventions employing an intersectional lens. We propose a template for fusing these three levels of engagement with intersectionality into a field of intersectional studies that emphasizes collaboration and literacy rather than unity. Our objective here is not to offer pat resolutions to all questions about intersectional approaches but to spark further inquiry into the dynamics of intersectionality both as an academic frame and as a practical intervention in a world characterized by extreme inequalities. At the same time, we wish to zero in on some issues that we believe have occupied a privileged place in the field from the very start, as well as on key questions that will define the field in the future. To that end, we foreground the social dynamics and relations that constitute subjects, displacing what often seems like an undue emphasis on the subjects (and categories) themselves as the starting point of inquiry. We also situate the development and contestation of these focal points of intersectional studies within the politics of academic and social movements-which, we argue, are themselves deeply intersectional in nature and therefore must continually be interrogated as part of the intersectional project. © 2013 by The University of Chicago. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:785 / 810
页数:26
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]  
Alexander-Floyd NG., 2012, Feminist Formations, V24, P1, DOI DOI 10.1353/FF.2012.0003
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2011, FRAMING INTERSECTION
[3]  
[Anonymous], TRANSVERSAL AUG
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2011, CONN LAW REV
[5]  
[Anonymous], BOUNDARY
[6]   Struggles for Institutional Space in France and the United Kingdom: Intersectionality and the Politics of Policy [J].
Bassel, Leah ;
Emejulu, Akwugo .
POLITICS & GENDER, 2010, 6 (04) :517-544
[7]   Multiple Disadvantages: An Empirical Test of Intersectionality Theory in EEO Litigation [J].
Best, Rachel Kahn ;
Edelman, Lauren B. ;
Krieger, Linda Hamilton ;
Eliason, Scott R. .
LAW & SOCIETY REVIEW, 2011, 45 (04) :991-1025
[8]   Identity Categories as Potential Coalitions [J].
Carastathis, Anna .
SIGNS, 2013, 38 (04) :941-965
[9]   THE INVISIBILITY OF PRIVILEGE: A CRITIQUE OF INTERSECTIONAL MODELS OF IDENTITY [J].
Carastathis, Anna .
ATELIERS DE L ETHIQUE-THE ETHICS FORUM, 2008, 3 (02) :23-38
[10]   Colorblind Intersectionality [J].
Carbado, Devon W. .
SIGNS, 2013, 38 (04) :811-845