Cost of stroke in the United Kingdom

被引:256
作者
Saka, Oemer [1 ]
McGuire, Alistair [1 ,2 ]
Wolfe, Charles [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Kings Coll London, Div Hlth & Social Care Res, London SE1 3QD, England
[2] Univ London London Sch Econ & Polit Sci, LSE Hlth & Social Care, London WC2A 2AE, England
[3] Guys & St Thomas NHS Fdn Trust, Biomed Res Ctr, NIHR, London, England
关键词
ECONOMIC BURDEN; CASE-FATALITY; RISK-FACTORS; REGISTER; DISEASE; DISABILITY; MORTALITY; LONDON; UK;
D O I
10.1093/ageing/afn281
中图分类号
R592 [老年病学]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 100203 ;
摘要
Introduction: this study aims to quantify the annual cost of illness of stroke to the UK economy. Methods: we estimate the cost of stroke from a societal perspective. Direct care costs include diagnosis, inpatient care and outpatient care. Income loss and social benefit payments to stroke patients are accounted for in the indirect cost calculations. Data from South London Stroke Register and a number of other national sources are used. Sensitivity analysis was carried out to account for the variability in the data used. Results: the treatment of and productivity loss arising from stroke results in total societal costs of 8.9 pound billion a year, with treatment costs accounting for approximately 5% of total UK NHS costs. Direct care accounts for approximately 50% of the total, informal care costs 27% and the indirect costs 24%. Sensitivity analysis did not alter the estimate of total costs significantly for most of the variables except using of differing prevalence rates. Conclusions: stroke incurs considerable societal costs. Our calculations show a high sensitivity to the underlying prevalence rates used. The findings highlight a need for further economic evaluations to ensure that there is an efficient use of resources devoted to the treatment of this disease.
引用
收藏
页码:27 / 32
页数:6
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]  
*BRIT MED ASS ROYA, 2004, 48 BRIT NAT FORM BRI
[2]   Use of time by stroke patients a comparison of four European rehabilitation centers [J].
De Wit, L ;
Putman, K ;
Dejaeger, E ;
Baert, I ;
Berman, P ;
Bogaerts, K ;
Brinkmann, N ;
Connell, L ;
Feys, H ;
Jenni, W ;
Kaske, C ;
Lesaffre, E ;
Leys, M ;
Lincoln, N ;
Louckx, F ;
Schuback, B ;
Schupp, W ;
Smith, B ;
De Weerdt, W .
STROKE, 2005, 36 (09) :1977-1983
[3]  
*DEP HLTH, 1999, HLTH SURV ENGL 1998
[4]  
*DEP HLTH FIN MAN, GUID CHANG HM TREAS
[5]  
*DEP SOC SEC, 2000, SOC SEC STAT 2000
[6]   A community based stroke register in a high risk area for stroke in north west England [J].
Du, XL ;
Sourbutts, J ;
Cruickshank, K ;
Summers, A ;
Roberts, N ;
Walton, E ;
Holmes, S .
JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY AND COMMUNITY HEALTH, 1997, 51 (05) :472-478
[7]   International comparison of stroke cost studies [J].
Evers, SMAA ;
Struijs, JN ;
Ament, AJHA ;
van Genugten, MLL ;
Jager, C ;
van den Bos, GAM .
STROKE, 2004, 35 (05) :1209-1215
[8]  
GEDDES JM, 1995, J EPIDEMIOL COMMUNIT, V50, P140
[9]   A comparison of the cost-effectiveness of stroke care provided in London and Copenhagen [J].
Grieve, R ;
Porsdal, V ;
Hutton, J ;
Wolfe, C .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT IN HEALTH CARE, 2000, 16 (02) :684-695
[10]  
*GUYS ST THOM FDN, FIN PERF REP 2004 20