A case-mix model for monitoring of postoperative mortality after surgery for lung cancer

被引:25
作者
Damhuis, R
Coonar, A
Plaisier, P
Dankers, M
Bekkers, J
Linklater, K
Moller, H
机构
[1] Rotterdam Canc Registry, NL-3000 AG Rotterdam, Netherlands
[2] Guys & St Thomas Hosp, London SE1 9RT, England
[3] Albert Schweitzer Hosp, NL-3300 AK Dordrecht, Netherlands
[4] Erasmus Univ, Med Ctr, NL-3000 CA Rotterdam, Netherlands
[5] Thames Canc Registry, London SE1 3QD, England
[6] Univ London London Sch Hyg & Trop Med, London WC1E 7HT, England
关键词
postoperative mortality; lung cancer; prognostic factor; surgery; quality; elderly;
D O I
10.1016/j.lungcan.2005.08.007
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: Postoperative mortality (POM) after surgery for lung cancer has been proposed as a performance indicator. Information on the size of the risk and its prognostic factors is needed to serve as a reference standard. Patients and methods: Electronic records from the Rotterdam Cancer Registry (n=2337) and the Thames Cancer Registry (n=3772) were retrieved and analysed by sex, age, period, histology, region and extent of surgery. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to determine prognostic factors, to calculate odds ratios (OR) and to develop a case-mix model. Results: POM was 4.2% (n=257) on average and increased with age from 1.7% for patients younger than 60 years up to 9.4% for octogenarians. After lobectomy, POM was 2.9% against 6.0% and 9.5% after pneumonectomy left and right, respectively. Multivariable analysis showed higher risk for men (OR=1.4) and tower risk for adenocarcinoma (OR=0.6). Conclusions: The final prediction model supports comparison and monitoring of POM rates for lung cancer. Only a Limited number of risk factors need to be registered to allow adjustment for case-mix. (C) 2005 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:123 / 129
页数:7
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]   The influence of hospital volume on survival after resection for lung cancer [J].
Bach, PB ;
Cramer, LD ;
Schrag, D ;
Downey, RJ ;
Gelfand, SE ;
Begg, CB .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2001, 345 (03) :181-188
[2]   Hospital volume and surgical mortality in the United States. [J].
Birkmeyer, JD ;
Siewers, AE ;
Finlayson, EVA ;
Stukel, TA ;
Lucas, FL ;
Batista, I ;
Welch, HG ;
Wennberg, DE .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2002, 346 (15) :1128-1137
[3]  
Cykert Samuel, 2004, Thorac Surg Clin, V14, P287, DOI 10.1016/S1547-4127(04)00016-7
[4]   Surgical mortality as an indicator of hospital quality - The problem with small sample size [J].
Dimick, JB ;
Welch, HG ;
Birkmeyer, JD .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2004, 292 (07) :847-851
[5]   Choosing the surgical mortality threshold for high risk patients with stage Ia non-small cell lung cancer: insights from decision analysis [J].
Dowie, J ;
Wildman, M .
THORAX, 2002, 57 (01) :7-10
[6]  
Fountain SW, 2001, THORAX, V56, P89
[7]   Cardiothoracic surgeons do a good job [J].
Graham, ANJ .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2002, 324 (7351) :1455-1456
[8]   Prognostic models of thirty-day mortality and morbidity after major pulmonary resection [J].
Harpole, DH ;
DeCamp, MM ;
Daley, J ;
Hur, K ;
Oprian, CA ;
Henderson, WG ;
Khuri, SF .
JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 1999, 117 (05) :969-979
[9]  
Hosmer W., 2000, Applied Logistic Regression, VSecond
[10]   Geographical inequalities in lung cancer management and survival in South East England: evidence of variation in access to oncology services? [J].
Jack, RH ;
Gulliford, MC ;
Ferguson, J ;
Moller, H .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2003, 88 (07) :1025-1031