Nonprice water conservation programs as a demand management tool

被引:73
作者
Michelsen, AM
McGuckin, JT
Stumpf, D
机构
[1] Texas A&M Univ, Dept Agr Econ, El Paso, TX 79927 USA
[2] New Mexico State Univ, Dept Econ, Las Cruces, NM 88003 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN WATER RESOURCES ASSOCIATION | 1999年 / 35卷 / 03期
关键词
economics; water conservation; water demand; water management; policy decision making;
D O I
10.1111/j.1752-1688.1999.tb03615.x
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Water providers nationwide are implementing nonprice conservation measures such as education, public information, appliance retrofit and ordinances, with the expectation that these programs will reduce residential water demand. However, little empirical information exists on the effectiveness of nonprice conservation programs in reducing water demand. Previous econometric studies indicate these programs have had minimal impact. We examine the types and number of major nonprice conservation programs that have been implemented during an Ii-year period in seven cities in the southwestern United States. A cross sectional, monthly time series residential water demand model, with parameters to control for variation in prices, temperature, precipitation and other factors, was used to empirically investigate the effectiveness of nonprice conservation programs in reducing water demand. We found significant reductions in use ranging between 1.1 percent and 4.0 percent per program. Because of the lack of information, we were unable to distinguish the effectiveness of individual or specific types of programs. Beyond finding that nonprice programs can be effective in reducing demand, questions regarding the efficiency and benefits to be achieved by conservation remain. As a step towards separating and evaluating the effects of individual programs, program benefits and efficiency, we recommend that utilities maintain more detailed and consistent information regarding the implementation of their nonprice programs.
引用
收藏
页码:593 / 602
页数:10
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], EFFECTIVENESS RESIDE
[2]  
BILLINGS RB, 1989, J AM WATER WORKS ASS, V81, P58
[3]   PRICE ELASTICITIES FOR WATER - CASE OF INCREASING BLOCK RATES [J].
BILLINGS, RB ;
AGTHE, DE .
LAND ECONOMICS, 1980, 56 (01) :73-84
[4]  
CAMERON TA, 1990, WATER RESOUR RES, V26, P179, DOI 10.1029/WR026i002p00179
[5]   WATER DEMAND ESTIMATION UNDER BLOCK RATE PRICING - A SIMULTANEOUS EQUATION APPROACH [J].
CHICOINE, DL ;
DELLER, SC ;
RAMAMURTHY, G .
WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 1986, 22 (06) :859-863
[6]   ANALYSIS OF RESIDENTIAL DEMAND FOR WATER USING MICRO TIME-SERIES DATA [J].
DANIELSON, LE .
WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 1979, 15 (04) :763-767
[7]   Price elasticity of residential demand for water: A meta-analysis [J].
Espey, M ;
Espey, J ;
Shaw, WD .
WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 1997, 33 (06) :1369-1374
[8]  
FERGUSON B, 1993, P CONSERVE 93, P429
[9]   URBAN RESIDENTIAL DEMAND FOR WATER IN THE UNITED-STATES [J].
FOSTER, HS ;
BEATTIE, BR .
LAND ECONOMICS, 1979, 55 (01) :43-58
[10]  
GILBERT JB, 1990, J AM WATER WORKS ASS, P35