Dynamics of grazing policy and practice: environmental and social impacts in three communal areas of southern Africa

被引:65
作者
Rohde, RF
Moleele, NM
Mphale, M
Allsopp, N
Chanda, R
Hoffman, MT
Magole, L
Young, E
机构
[1] Univ Edinburgh, Ctr African Studies, Edinburgh, Midlothian, Scotland
[2] Univ Botswana, Harry Oppenheimer Okavango Res Ctr, GEF UNDP Wetland Biodivers Conservat Project, Maun, Botswana
[3] Univ Lesotho, Dept Sociol, Maseru, Lesotho
[4] Univ Western Cape, ARC Range & Forage Sci, ZA-7535 Bellville, South Africa
[5] Univ Botswana, Dept Environm Sci, Gaborone, Botswana
[6] Univ Cape Town, Dept Bot, Leslie Hill Inst Plant Conservat, ZA-7701 Rondebosch, South Africa
[7] Univ Wales, Ctr Arid Zone Studies, Bangor, Gwynedd, Wales
关键词
pastoralism; communal land; rangeland management; rangeland ecology;
D O I
10.1016/j.envsci.2005.11.009
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This paper traces the history of grazing policy, its conceptual basis, practical implementations and outcomes, in three southern African countries. in spite of the divergent environmental conditions facing pastoralists in the Highlands of Lesotho, Botswana's southern Kalahari and the Namaqualand succulent karoo in South Africa, they have all been subjected to similar grazing and rangeland management policies. The theoretical underpinnings of such policies have their origins in a development paradigm and ecological theory derived from northern temperate environments and are directly related to two persistent and powerful narratives: 'land degradation' and 'the tragedy of the commons'. Policy and development initiatives were implemented in order to overcome the perceived causes of these negative scenarios, such as overstocking, open access tenure and low output subsistence production. They typically ignored the multi-purpose goals of traditional pastoral systems and emphasized commercialisation of livestock farming and privatisation of communal land, which resulted in the weakening or destruction of local, traditional land management institutions. Such policies have survived the transitions from colonial rule to independence and from apartheid to democracy. We argue that these powerful and pervasive ideas, when applied to grazing policies, have caused the very problems they were formulated to prevent. (C) 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:302 / 316
页数:15
相关论文
共 81 条
[1]  
Abel N. O. J., 1989, Land Degradation & Rehabilitation, V1, P101, DOI 10.1002/ldr.3400010204
[2]  
AMUSA LA, 1999, THESIS U BOTSWANA
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2001, NATURE DIVIDED LAND
[4]  
Archer F., 1997, WOMEN LAND AUTHORITY, P84
[5]  
Archer F, 1989, J GRASSLAND SOC SO A, V6, P211, DOI [10.1080/02566702.1989.9648190, DOI 10.1080/02566702.1989.9648190]
[6]  
BAWDEN MG, 1968, 3 DIR OV SURV LAND R
[7]  
Behnke R., 1993, Rethinking range ecology: implications for rangeland management in Africa
[8]  
BENJAMINSEN TA, 2006, IN PRESS ANN ASS AM
[9]  
BOONZAIER E, 1987, DEV SO AFR, V4, P479, DOI DOI 10.1080/03768358708439336
[10]  
Boonzaier EmileCandy Malherbe., 1996, The Cape Herders: A History of the Khoikhoi of Southern Africa