Effects of opportunistic predation on anti-predator behavioural responses in a guild of ground foragers

被引:17
作者
Fernández-Juricic, E
Jokimäki, J
McDonald, JC
Melado, F
Toledano, A
Mayo, C
Martín, B
Fresneda, I
Martín, V
机构
[1] Calif State Univ Long Beach, Dept Biol Sci, Long Beach, CA 90840 USA
[2] Univ Lapland, Arctic Ctr, Rovaniemi 96101, Finland
[3] Grp Ecol Aplicada, Madrid 28040, Spain
关键词
anti-predator behaviour; attack rate; opportunistic predation; prey selection; vigilance;
D O I
10.1007/s00442-004-1560-0
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
We studied factors that affect prey selection by a generalist predator that opportunistically attacks prey species, and the associated inter- and intra-specific responses of prey to this type of predation. Our model system was a guild of ground-foraging birds that are preyed upon by magpies (Pica pica) during the breeding season. We found that magpies attacked up to 12 species during three consecutive breeding seasons. The overall capture success was estimated to be 4.9%. Magpies tended to attack from the air, targeting solitary prey, either on the ground or flying. Inter-specific prey responses to the risk of magpie predation included a reduction in the mean number of species occupying a foraging patch when magpies were present and a decrease in the distance between heterospecific neighbours. Intra-specific responses to magpie predation varied between species that were subject to different attack rates. Preferentially attacked prey enhanced their risk responses (increase in scanning time and scanning rate in the presence of magpies) relative to those species attacked in proportion to their abundance (increase only in scanning rate with magpies). Species attacked infrequently, relative to their abundance, showed no antipredator response. The probability of being attacked, rather than mortality rate, appears to be the factor to which prey species respond.
引用
收藏
页码:183 / 190
页数:8
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]   The nature of predation: prey dependent, ratio dependent or neither? [J].
Abrams, PA ;
Ginzburg, LR .
TRENDS IN ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION, 2000, 15 (08) :337-341
[2]   WHY PREDATION RATE SHOULD NOT BE PROPORTIONAL TO PREDATOR DENSITY [J].
ABRAMS, PA .
ECOLOGY, 1993, 74 (03) :726-733
[3]   The evolution of predator-prey interactions: Theory and evidence [J].
Abrams, PA .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF ECOLOGY AND SYSTEMATICS, 2000, 31 :79-105
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1994, HDB BIRDS EUROPE MID
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1991, MAGPIES ECOLOGY BEHA
[6]  
Attridge Wesley, 1997, British Birds, V90, P191
[7]   Anti-predation behaviour of red colobus monkeys in the presence of chimpanzees [J].
Bshary, R ;
Noe, R .
BEHAVIORAL ECOLOGY AND SOCIOBIOLOGY, 1997, 41 (05) :321-333
[8]   FLOCKING IS AN EFFECTIVE ANTI-PREDATION STRATEGY IN REDSHANKS, TRINGA-TETANUS [J].
CRESSWELL, W .
ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR, 1994, 47 (02) :433-442
[9]   Does an opportunistic predator preferentially attack nonvigilant prey? [J].
Cresswell, W ;
Lind, J ;
Kaby, U ;
Quinn, JL ;
Jakobsson, S .
ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR, 2003, 66 :643-648
[10]   Surprise as a winter hunting strategy in Sparrowhawks Accipiter nisus, Peregrines Falco peregrinus and merlins F-columbarius [J].
Cresswell, W .
IBIS, 1996, 138 (04) :684-692