The practice of evaluation in innovation policy in Europe

被引:31
作者
Edler, Jakob [1 ]
Berger, Martin [2 ]
Dinges, Michael [2 ]
Goek, Abdullah [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Manchester, MBS, Manchester Inst Innovat Res, Manchester, Lancs, England
[2] Joanneum Res, Vienna, Austria
关键词
evaluation; innovation policy; evaluation practice; evaluation typology;
D O I
10.1093/reseval/rvs014
中图分类号
G25 [图书馆学、图书馆事业]; G35 [情报学、情报工作];
学科分类号
1205 ; 120501 ;
摘要
This article characterizes and analyses evaluation practice in national innovation policy across Europe. It is the first study that examines and interprets the characteristics, quality, usefulness, and consequences of evaluations in a systematic way. The analysis is based on the comprehensive INNO-Appraisal repository of 171 evaluation reports of national innovation policies of EU25 countries, conducted between 2002 and 2007. The article seeks (1) to assess the state of the art of evaluation in innovation policy at national level, (2) to understand how different key dimensions of evaluation (timing, purpose, methods, tendering process, etc.) relate to each other, and (3) to explore types of evaluations. On that basis, we (4) draw lessons as to what constitutes good practice in evaluation, as the results of the survey have been exchanged and discussed with a number of policy makers of the sample responsible for the evaluation. The article thus both contributes to the academic understanding of policy evaluation and supports use in policy practice.
引用
收藏
页码:167 / 182
页数:16
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]  
Amanatidou E., 2011, EUNIP INT WORKSH EV
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2009, MONITORING EVALUATIO
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2005, Journal of Data Science, DOI DOI 10.6339/JDS.2005.03(1).192
[4]   Evaluating research and innovation policy: a systems world needs systems evaluations [J].
Arnold, E .
RESEARCH EVALUATION, 2004, 13 (01) :3-17
[5]  
Arnold E., 1997, OECD P
[6]  
Bergs S., 1981, THESIS MUENSTER
[7]  
Buhrer S., 2011, EUNIP INT WORKSH EV
[8]  
BUISSERET TJ, 1995, INT J TECHNOL MANAGE, V10, P587
[9]   A comprehensive typology for program evaluation [J].
Chen, HT .
EVALUATION PRACTICE, 1996, 17 (02) :121-130
[10]   Evaluating the demand side: New challenges for evaluation [J].
Edler, J. ;
Georghiou, L. ;
Blind, K. ;
Uyarra, E. .
RESEARCH EVALUATION, 2012, 21 (01) :33-47