Prioritisation of an IT budget within a local authority

被引:4
作者
Jessop, A [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Durham, Sch Business, Durham DH1 3LB, England
关键词
group decision support; information systems; multi-objective; cluster analysis;
D O I
10.1057/palgrave/jors/2601266
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
This paper describes the prioritisation of an IT budget within a department of a local authority. The decision problem is cast as a simple multiattribute evaluation but from two perspectives. First, as an exercise in group decision making. Herethe emphasis is on a shared process wherein the object is to obtain consensus. The use of an explicit evaluationframework and the ability to interact with the evaluation data in real time via a simple spreadsheet model were found toimprove the decision making. Second, the prioritisation is made analytically. The motivation is to determine the degree towhich the rankings are the result of the structural characteristics of the projects themselves rather than of the differencesin importance attached to the achievement of the goals represented by the project attributes. Three methods are used:Monte Carlo simulation of ranks, cluster analysis based on attributes and an approach based on entropy maximisation. Itis found that in the case studied the structure inherent in the data is high and so the results of the analyses are robust.Finally, a procedure is suggested for the appropriate use of these analyses via a facilitator to aid prioritization decisions. © 2002 Operational Research Society Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:36 / 46
页数:11
相关论文
共 51 条
[1]  
Anderberg M.R., 1973, Probability and Mathematical Statistics
[2]   Acts of faith: instinct, value and IT investment decisions [J].
Bannister, F ;
Remenyi, D .
JOURNAL OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, 2000, 15 (03) :231-241
[3]   The efficacy of SMARTER - Simple multi-attribute rating technique extended to ranking [J].
Barron, FH ;
Barrett, BE .
ACTA PSYCHOLOGICA, 1996, 93 (1-3) :23-36
[4]   SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS OF ADDITIVE MULTIATTRIBUTE VALUE MODELS [J].
BARRON, H ;
SCHMIDT, CP .
OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 1988, 36 (01) :122-127
[5]   SOCIAL POWER IN PLAN-GENERATION [J].
BATTY, M .
TOWN PLANNING REVIEW, 1974, 45 (03) :291-310
[6]  
Batty M., 1974, ENVIRON PLANN B, V1, P125, DOI 10.1068/b010125
[7]  
BATTY M, 1971, ARCH DESIGN, V41, P498
[8]  
BATTY M, 1971, ARCH DESIGN, V41, P435
[9]  
BEACH LR, 1997, PSYCHOL DECISION MAK, pCH9
[10]  
BORCHERDING K, 1995, CONTRIBUTIONS TO DECISION MAKING - I, P3