Blinded predictions of host-guest standard free energies of binding in the SAMPL5 challenge

被引:24
作者
Bosisio, Stefano [1 ]
Mey, Antonia S. J. S. [1 ]
Michel, Julien [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Edinburgh, EaStCHEM Sch Chem, David Brewster Rd, Edinburgh EH9 3FJ, Midlothian, Scotland
基金
欧洲研究理事会;
关键词
SAMPL5; Binding free energies; Host-guest systems; MOLECULAR-DYNAMICS SIMULATIONS; HYDRATION FREE-ENERGIES; CONTAINERS INFLUENCE; FORCE-FIELDS; AFFINITIES; WATER; COMPUTATION; MODELS;
D O I
10.1007/s10822-016-9933-0
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
In the context of the SAMPL5 blinded challenge standard free energies of binding were predicted for a dataset of 22 small guest molecules and three different host molecules octa-acids (OAH and OAMe) and a cucurbituril (CBC). Three sets of predictions were submitted, each based on different variations of classical molecular dynamics alchemical free energy calculation protocols based on the double annihilation method. The first model (model A) yields a free energy of binding based on computed free energy changes in solvated and host-guest complex phases; the second (model B) adds long range dispersion corrections to the previous result; the third (model C) uses an additional standard state correction term to account for the use of distance restraints during the molecular dynamics simulations. Model C performs the best in terms of mean unsigned error for all guests (MUE -95 % confidence interval) for the whole data set and in particular for the octa-acid systems (MUE ). The overall correlation with experimental data for all models is encouraging (). The correlation between experimental and computational free energy of binding ranks as one of the highest with respect to other entries in the challenge. Nonetheless the large MUE for the best performing model highlights systematic errors, and submissions from other groups fared better with respect to this metric.
引用
收藏
页码:61 / 70
页数:10
相关论文
共 53 条
[1]   Accurate calculation of the absolute free energy of binding for drug molecules [J].
Aldeghi, Matteo ;
Heifetz, Alexander ;
Bodkin, Michael J. ;
Knappcd, Stefan ;
Biggin, Philip C. .
CHEMICAL SCIENCE, 2016, 7 (01) :207-218
[2]   MOLECULAR-DYNAMICS SIMULATIONS AT CONSTANT PRESSURE AND-OR TEMPERATURE [J].
ANDERSEN, HC .
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS, 1980, 72 (04) :2384-2393
[3]   Prediction of hydration free energies for the SAMPL4 diverse set of compounds using molecular dynamics simulations with the OPLS-AA force field [J].
Beckstein, Oliver ;
Fourrier, Anais ;
Iorga, Bogdan I. .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTER-AIDED MOLECULAR DESIGN, 2014, 28 (03) :265-276
[4]  
Bosisio S, 2016, J COMPUT AI IN PRESS
[5]  
Case D.A., 2014, Amber 14, V14
[6]   Free energy, entropy, and induced fit in host-guest recognition: Calculations with the second-generation mining minima algorithm [J].
Chang, CE ;
Gilson, MK .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2004, 126 (40) :13156-13164
[7]   Is Conformational Sampling of Drug-like Molecules a Solved Problem? [J].
Chen, I-Jen ;
Foloppe, Nicolas .
DRUG DEVELOPMENT RESEARCH, 2011, 72 (01) :85-94
[8]   OpenMM 4: A Reusable, Extensible, Hardware Independent Library for High Performance Molecular Simulation [J].
Eastman, Peter ;
Friedrichs, Mark S. ;
Chodera, John D. ;
Radmer, Randall J. ;
Bruns, Christopher M. ;
Ku, Joy P. ;
Beauchamp, Kyle A. ;
Lane, Thomas J. ;
Wang, Lee-Ping ;
Shukla, Diwakar ;
Tye, Tony ;
Houston, Mike ;
Stich, Timo ;
Klein, Christoph ;
Shirts, Michael R. ;
Pande, Vijay S. .
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL THEORY AND COMPUTATION, 2013, 9 (01) :461-469
[9]  
Frenkel D., 1996, Understanding molecular dynamics simulation from algorithms to applications
[10]   Nonmonotonic Assembly of a Deep-Cavity Cavitand [J].
Gan, Haiying ;
Benjamin, Christopher J. ;
Gibb, Bruce C. .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2011, 133 (13) :4770-4773