The intercomparison of selected cloud retrieval algorithms

被引:28
作者
Nauss, T
Kokhanovsky, AA
Nakajima, TY
Reudenbach, C
Bendix, J
机构
[1] Univ Marburg, Lab Climatol & Remote Sensing, D-35032 Marburg, Germany
[2] Univ Bremen, Inst Environm Phys, D-28334 Bremen, Germany
[3] EORC, JAXA, Chuo Ku, Tokyo 1046023, Japan
关键词
cloud properties; radiative transfer; inverse problems;
D O I
10.1016/j.atmosres.2005.02.005
中图分类号
P4 [大气科学(气象学)];
学科分类号
0706 ; 070601 ;
摘要
The paper is devoted to the comparison of selected cloud retrieval algorithms. In particular, the authors compare cloud optical thickness, liquid water path and effective droplet size as obtained from the algorithms developed at the Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA) and US National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) and a new simplified cloud retrieval algorithm that is based on the analytical solutions of the radiative transfer equations valid for optically thick weakly absorbing cloud layers. Over ocean all three retrievals show very close results but differences increase for a scene over land. This is mainly caused by uncertainties due to the unknown surface albedo, especially for the semi-analytical approach that is based on measurements at 0.86 mu m, where the contribution from ground is particularly large. Still, the simplified analytical retrieval technique gives results comparable with much more advanced codes. (c) 2005 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:46 / 78
页数:33
相关论文
共 69 条
[1]   Discriminating clear sky from clouds with MODIS [J].
Ackerman, SA ;
Strabala, KI ;
Menzel, WP ;
Frey, RA ;
Moeller, CC ;
Gumley, LE .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 1998, 103 (D24) :32141-32157
[2]  
ACKERMAN SA, 1990, MON WEATHER REV, V118, P2377, DOI 10.1175/1520-0493(1990)118<2377:TOFICC>2.0.CO
[3]  
2
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1991, IMAGE TRANSFER SCATT
[5]  
ARKING A, 1985, J CLIM APPL METEOROL, V24, P322, DOI 10.1175/1520-0450(1985)024<0322:ROCCPF>2.0.CO
[6]  
2
[7]  
AUSTIN P, 1995, J ATMOS SCI, V52, P2329, DOI 10.1175/1520-0469(1995)052<2329:PISCOA>2.0.CO
[8]  
2
[9]  
Baum BA, 2003, J APPL METEOROL, V42, P905, DOI 10.1175/1520-0450(2003)042<0905:NMCDUM>2.0.CO
[10]  
2