Use of cyclosporine in renal transplantation

被引:8
作者
Lloveras, J [1 ]
机构
[1] Autonomous Univ Barcelona, Hosp del Mar, Dept Nephrol, E-08193 Barcelona, Spain
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.transproceed.2004.01.064
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
The first cyclosporine trials in renal transplantation began in Cambridge in 1978. Between 1982 and 1985 several large multicenter trials and the reports from large series of patients evidenced that cyclosporine was a major advance in the prevention of acute rejection episodes and in improving short-term and long-term graft survival. Cyclosporine also showed the capacity to mitigate immunologic risk factors, HLA mismatching, and lack of pretransplant transfusions. However, cyclosporine has the serious defect of being nephrotoxic. Induction therapy with OKT3, polyclonal antibodies, and more recently with anti IL-2R monoclonal antibodies allowed the delay of introduction cyclosporine in patients showing posttransplant graft dysfunction. Other relatively unsuccessful attempts for overcoming cyclosporine nephrotoxicity were made before the association of new xenobiotics such as mycophenolate mofetil or sirolimus permitted cyclosporine doses to be reduced. These combinations reduce acute rejection incidence to below 20%, with its consequent positive impact on long-term graft outcome and also allow a safer steroid sparing and withdrawal early posttransplantation. Also, the association of cyclosporine with other new compounds. such as the lymphocyte homing FTY20 or the peripheral lymphocyte-depleting Campath-1-IgG is currently under clinical investigation. Cyclosporine's future place is yet to be established in the new era of immunosuppression.
引用
收藏
页码:107S / 113S
页数:7
相关论文
共 87 条
[1]   THE LONG-TERM EFFECTS OF PROPHYLACTIC OKT3 MONOCLONAL-ANTIBODY IN CADAVER KIDNEY-TRANSPLANTATION - A SINGLE-CENTER, PROSPECTIVE, RANDOMIZED STUDY [J].
ABRAMOWICZ, D ;
GOLDMAN, M ;
DEPAUW, L ;
VANHERWEGHEM, JL ;
KINNAERT, P ;
VEREERSTRAETEN, P .
TRANSPLANTATION, 1992, 54 (03) :433-437
[2]   Chronic cyclosporine nephropathy: The Achilles' heel of immunosuppressive therapy [J].
Bennett, WM ;
DeMattos, A ;
Meyer, MM ;
Andoh, T ;
Barry, JM .
KIDNEY INTERNATIONAL, 1996, 50 (04) :1089-1100
[3]   IMPROVED RESULTS USING OKT3 AS INDUCTION IMMUNOSUPPRESSION IN RENAL-ALLOGRAFT RECIPIENTS WITH DELAYED GRAFT FUNCTION [J].
BENVENISTY, AI ;
COHEN, D ;
STEGALL, MD ;
HARDY, MA .
TRANSPLANTATION, 1990, 49 (02) :321-327
[4]   Long-term outcome of tacrolimus rescue therapy in late rejection after renal transplantation [J].
Budde, K ;
Smettan, S ;
Fritsche, L ;
Waiser, J ;
Giessing, M ;
Kunz, R ;
Türk, I ;
Bauer, S ;
Mai, I ;
Neumayer, HH .
TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 1998, 30 (05) :1780-1781
[5]  
CALNE RY, 1987, LANCET, V2, P506
[6]  
CALNE RY, 1979, LANCET, V2, P1033
[7]  
CAMMISULI S, 1982, CYCLOSPORIN A, P243
[8]  
Canadian Multicentre Transplant Study Group, 1986, N Engl J Med, V314, P1219
[9]   Comparison of neoral dose monitoring with cyclosporine trough levels versus 2-hr postdose levels in stable liver transplant patients [J].
Cantarovich, M ;
Barkun, JS ;
Tchervenkov, JI ;
Besner, JG ;
Aspeslet, L ;
Metrakos, P .
TRANSPLANTATION, 1998, 66 (12) :1621-1627
[10]   Dyslipidemia in renal transplant recipients treated with a sirolimus and cyclosporine-based immunosuppressive regimen: Incidence, risk factors, progression, and prognosis [J].
Chueh, SCJ ;
Kahan, BD .
TRANSPLANTATION, 2003, 76 (02) :375-382