On the segregation of genetically modified, conventional and organic products in European agriculture: A multi-market equilibrium analysis

被引:25
作者
Moschini, G [1 ]
Bulut, H [1 ]
Cembalo, L [1 ]
机构
[1] Iowa State Univ, Dept Econ, Pioneer Endowed Chair Econ, Ames, IA 50011 USA
关键词
biotechnology; differentiated demand; genetically modified crops; identity preservation; innovation; welfare;
D O I
10.1111/j.1477-9552.2005.00022.x
中图分类号
F3 [农业经济];
学科分类号
0202 ; 020205 ; 1203 ;
摘要
Evaluating the possible benefits of the introduction of genetically modified (GM) crops must address the issue of consumer resistance as well as the complex regulation that has ensued. In the European Union (EU), this regulation envisions the co-existence of GM food with conventional and quality-enhanced products, mandates the labelling and traceability of GM products and allows only a stringent adventitious presence of GM content in other products. All these elements are brought together within a partial equilibrium model of the EU agricultural food sector. The model comprises conventional, GM and organic food. Demand is modelled in a novel fashion, whereby organic and conventional products are treated as horizontally differentiated but GM products are vertically differentiated (weakly inferior) relative to conventional ones. Supply accounts explicitly for the land constraint at the sector level and for the need for additional resources to produce organic food. Model calibration and simulation allow insights into the qualitative and quantitative effects of the large-scale introduction of GM products in the EU market. We find that the introduction of GM food reduces overall EU welfare, mostly because of the associated need for costly segregation of non-GM products, but the producers of quality-enhanced products actually benefit.
引用
收藏
页码:347 / 372
页数:26
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]  
Boccaletti S., 2000, AgBioForum, V3, P259
[2]  
Brookes, 2004, COEXISTENCE GM NONGM
[3]  
BUCKWELL A, 1999, EC IP GENETICALLY MO
[4]  
BULLOCK D, 2001, GENETICALLY MODIFIED, P47
[5]  
*COMM EUR COMM, 2003, COMM REC GUID DEV NA
[6]   Ex ante welfare effects of agricultural biotechnology in the European Union: The case of transgenic herbicide tolerant sugarbeet [J].
Demont, M ;
Tollens, E .
REGULATION OF AGRICULTURAL BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2004, :239-255
[7]   Biodiversity versus transgenic sugar beet: the one euro question [J].
Demont, M ;
Wesseler, J ;
Tollens, E .
EUROPEAN REVIEW OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2004, 31 (01) :1-18
[8]  
DESQUILBET M, 2001, IATRC M
[9]  
*EU DIR GEN AGR, 2003, AGR EUR UN STAT EC
[10]  
*EUR COMM, 2002, SCEN COEX GEN MOD CO