Dry matter content as a measure of dry matter concentration in plants and their parts

被引:189
作者
Shipley, B [1 ]
Vu, TT
机构
[1] Univ Sherbrooke, Dept Biol, Sherbrooke, PQ J1K 2R1, Canada
[2] Univ Paris 06, F-75252 Paris 05, France
关键词
dry matter content; dry matter concentration; mass concentration of dry matter; specific leaf area; tissue density;
D O I
10.1046/j.0028-646X.2001.00320.x
中图分类号
Q94 [植物学];
学科分类号
071001 ;
摘要
This study compared the predictive ability of dry matter content (DMC, dry mass per fresh mass) of leaves, stems, roots and entire plants in relation to dry matter concentration (D, dry mass per volume of plant organ). Data came from 28 species of field-collected plants (woody and herbaceous) and 17 species of herbaceous plants grown in hydroponic sand culture. Specific leaf areas were also measured. Dry matter content of the herbaceous plants grown in sand culture varied more between tissue types than did dry matter concentration but the correlation among plant parts was stronger when using DMC. Means and standard errors for DMC (g g(-1)) were 0.212 +/- 0.009 (leaves), 0.176 +/- 0.012 (support tissues) and 0.170 +/- 0.021 (roots); for D (g cm(-3)) the values were 0.158 +/- 0.010 (leaves), 0.168 +/- 0.017 (support tissues) and 0.153 +/- 0.013 (roots). Leaf DMC provided approximate estimates of leaf D (r = 0.76) for the field-collected plants but sclerophyllous leaves from shrubs restricted to acidic bogs proved to be outliers. The relationship between these two variables was stronger in the herbaceous species grown in sand culture, especially so for whole plant estimates (r = 0.91). Dry matter content and dry matter concentration were equally good predictors of specific leaf area.
引用
收藏
页码:359 / 364
页数:6
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]  
Field C.H. H.A. Mooney., 1986, EC PLANT FORM FUNCTI, P25
[2]   A standardized protocol for the determination of specific leaf area and leaf dry matter content [J].
Garnier, E ;
Shipley, B ;
Roumet, C ;
Laurent, G .
FUNCTIONAL ECOLOGY, 2001, 15 (05) :688-695
[3]   ESTIMATION OF THE FRACTURE-TOUGHNESS OF LEAVES [J].
LUCAS, PW ;
PEREIRA, B .
FUNCTIONAL ECOLOGY, 1990, 4 (06) :819-822
[4]  
MARIEVICTORIN F, 1964, FLORE LAURENTIENNE
[5]  
*MATHS, 1999, SPLUS 2000 US GUID
[6]   COMPONENTS OF RELATIVE GROWTH-RATE AND SENSITIVITY TO NITROGEN AVAILABILITY IN ANNUAL AND PERENNIAL SPECIES OF BROMUS [J].
MULLER, B ;
GARNIER, E .
OECOLOGIA, 1990, 84 (04) :513-518
[7]   LEAF-AREA RATIO AND NET ASSIMILATION RATE OF 24 WILD-SPECIES DIFFERING IN RELATIVE GROWTH-RATE [J].
POORTER, H ;
REMKES, C .
OECOLOGIA, 1990, 83 (04) :553-559
[8]   From tropics to tundra: Global convergence in plant functioning [J].
Reich, PB ;
Walters, MB ;
Ellsworth, DS .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 1997, 94 (25) :13730-13734
[9]   LEAF LIFE-SPAN IN RELATION TO LEAF, PLANT, AND STAND CHARACTERISTICS AMONG DIVERSE ECOSYSTEMS [J].
REICH, PB ;
WALTERS, MB ;
ELLSWORTH, DS .
ECOLOGICAL MONOGRAPHS, 1992, 62 (03) :365-392
[10]  
Roderick ML, 2000, FUNCT ECOL, V14, P244, DOI 10.1046/j.1365-2435.2000.00414.x