Corporate Social Responsibility and Its Impact on Firms' Investment Policy, Organizational Structure, and Performance

被引:137
作者
Erhemjamts, Otgontsetseg [1 ]
Li, Qian [2 ]
Venkateswaran, Anand [3 ]
机构
[1] Bentley Univ, Waltham, MA 02452 USA
[2] Midwestern State Univ, Dillard Coll Business Adm, Wichita Falls, TX 76308 USA
[3] Northeastern Univ, Coll Business, Boston, MA 02421 USA
关键词
Corporate social responsibility; Firm performance; Investment policy; Organizational strategy; RESOURCE-BASED VIEW; FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE; STAKEHOLDER THEORY; MANAGEMENT; DISCLOSURE;
D O I
10.1007/s10551-012-1594-x
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This study examines the determinants of corporate social responsibility (CSR) and its implications on firms' investment policy, organizational strategy, and performance. First, we find that firms with better performance, higher R&D intensity, better financial health, and firms in new economy industries are more likely to engage in CSR activities, while riskier firms are less likely to do so. We also find U-shaped relation between firm size and CSR, indicating that either very small or very large firms exhibit high levels of CSR strengths and concerns. Next, we find that firms' CSR strengths relate favorably with their investments, organizational strategy, and performance, whereas CSR concerns and firm attributes are by and large negatively related. Using a 2SLS procedure, we verify that the CSR-performance relation is robust to corrections for endogeneity through reverse causation and/or biases introduced by time varying omitted variables. Finally, we find that the CSR-firm attributes relation is strengthened when the CEO's incentives are below the sample median, suggesting that CSR participation is especially important when monetary incentives are lower than benchmark levels.
引用
收藏
页码:395 / 412
页数:18
相关论文
共 46 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2000, BUS SOC REV, V105, P393, DOI [DOI 10.1111/0045-3609.00090, 10.1111/0045-3609.00090]
[2]   FIRM RESOURCES AND SUSTAINED COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE [J].
BARNEY, J .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 1991, 17 (01) :99-120
[3]   Does stakeholder orientation matter? The relationship between stakeholder management models and firm financial performance [J].
Berman, SL ;
Wicks, AC ;
Kotha, S ;
Jones, TM .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 1999, 42 (05) :488-506
[4]   Managing with style: The effect of managers on firm policies [J].
Bertrand, M ;
Schoar, A .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 2003, 118 (04) :1169-1208
[5]   THE IMPACT OF CORPORATE CHARACTERISTICS ON SOCIAL-RESPONSIBILITY DISCLOSURE - A TYPOLOGY AND FREQUENCY-BASED ANALYSIS [J].
COWEN, SS ;
FERRERI, LB ;
PARKER, LD .
ACCOUNTING ORGANIZATIONS AND SOCIETY, 1987, 12 (02) :111-122
[6]   Voluntary Nonfinancial Disclosure and the Cost of Equity Capital: The Initiation of Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting [J].
Dhaliwal, Dan S. ;
Li, Oliver Zhen ;
Tsang, Albert ;
Yang, Yong George .
ACCOUNTING REVIEW, 2011, 86 (01) :59-100
[7]   THE STAKEHOLDER THEORY OF THE CORPORATION - CONCEPTS, EVIDENCE, AND IMPLICATIONS [J].
DONALDSON, T ;
PRESTON, LE .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 1995, 20 (01) :65-91
[8]   Does corporate social responsibility affect the cost of capital? [J].
El Ghoul, Sadok ;
Guedhami, Omrane ;
Kwok, Chuck C. Y. ;
Mishra, Dev R. .
JOURNAL OF BANKING & FINANCE, 2011, 35 (09) :2388-2406
[9]  
Freeman R., 2001, SSRN ELECT J, DOI [10.2139/ssrn.263511, DOI 10.2139/SSRN.263511]
[10]  
Friedman M., 2007, Corporate Ethics and Corporate Governance, P173, DOI [10.1007/978-3-540-70818-6_14, DOI 10.1007/978-3-540-70818-6_14]