Magnetic resonance imaging of tunnel placement in posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

被引:21
作者
Mariani, PP
Adriani, E
Bellelli, A
Maresca, G
机构
[1] Univ La Sapienza, Clin Ortoped, I-00185 Rome, Italy
[2] San Pietro Hosp FBF, Dept Diagnost Radiol, Rome, Italy
[3] San Pietro Hosp FBF, Lab Arthroscop Surg, Rome, Italy
来源
ARTHROSCOPY | 1999年 / 15卷 / 07期
关键词
knee; posterior cruciate ligament; arthroscopy; MRI; ligament reconstruction;
D O I
10.1016/S0749-8063(99)70005-8
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
The aim of this study was to define a reproducible method for evaluating posterior cruciate Ligament (PCL) reconstructions using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). A 2-fold investigation was performed. In part I, the "footprints" of an intact PCL were located on MRI and their coordinates were defined. Measurements were made on the images of 50 subjects using axial, coronal, and sagittal planes. Interobserver variability was calculated by averaging the measurements of the 2 reviewers and using the Kappa coefficient. Three points of reference were located: tibial attachment on the tibial axial plane, and two femoral attachments on the sagittal and coronal oblique planes. In part II, stability of 20 PCL reconstructions with a bone-patellar tendon-bone (BPTB) autograft were evaluated and scored using the IKDC evaluation form after a 2-year follow-up. Stability was evaluated clinically and instrumentally using a KT-2000 arthrometer at 89 N with the knee flexed at a neutral quadriceps knee angle of approximately 70 degrees. Seven cases were graded A (0 to 2 mm), 11 graded B (3 to 5 mm), and 2 graded C (6 to 10 mm). All patients had an MRT after an average of 16 months (range, 12 to 24 months, 2 SD). The previous measurements from part I of the study were used to make a correlation between achieved stability and tunnel location. A 1-factor analysis of variance (ANOVA), nonparametric ANOVA, and the Fisher Exact test were used to determine if clinical outcome of the 3 groups was influenced by graft placement. At MRI evaluation, excessive deep placement was observed in 4 cases and a correlation between improper femoral tunnel location and stability was statistically significant (P < .05). A correct placement of tibial tunnel was observed in all patients. In our analysis, proper location of the femoral tunnel seems to be more critical and difficult to achieve than tibial tunnel placement, probably because of the lack of specific anatomic landmarks during surgery.
引用
收藏
页码:733 / 740
页数:8
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]
ANDREWS JR, 1994, KNEE, P895
[2]
Bomberg B., 1990, AM J KNEE SURG, V3, P85
[3]
Testing for isometry during reconstruction of the posterior cruciate ligament - Anatomic and biomechanical considerations [J].
Covey, DC ;
Sapega, AA ;
Sherman, GM .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 1996, 24 (06) :740-746
[4]
FENTON PJ, 1994, SPORTS MED ARTHROSC, V2, P129
[5]
Friederich N, 1992, The knee and the cruciate ligaments, P78
[6]
Posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction - An in vitro study of femoral and tibial graft placement [J].
Galloway, MT ;
Grood, ES ;
Mehalik, JN ;
Levy, M ;
Saddler, SC ;
Noyes, FR .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 1996, 24 (04) :437-445
[7]
FACTORS AFFECTING THE REGION OF MOST ISOMETRIC FEMORAL ATTACHMENTS .1. THE POSTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT [J].
GROOD, ES ;
HEFZY, MS ;
LINDENFIELD, TN .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 1989, 17 (02) :197-207
[8]
MAGNETIC-RESONANCE-IMAGING OF THE POSTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT - CLINICAL USE TO IMPROVE DIAGNOSTIC-ACCURACY [J].
GROSS, ML ;
GROVER, JS ;
BASSETT, LW ;
SEEGER, LL ;
FINERMAN, GAM .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 1992, 20 (06) :732-737
[9]
ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT RECONSTRUCTION - ENDOSCOPIC VERSUS 2-INCISION TECHNIQUE [J].
HARNER, CD ;
MARKS, PH ;
FU, FH ;
IRRGANG, JJ ;
SILBY, MB ;
MENGATO, R .
ARTHROSCOPY, 1994, 10 (05) :502-512
[10]
MEASUREMENTS OF THE INTERCONDYLAR NOTCH BY PLAIN FILM RADIOGRAPHY AND MAGNETIC-RESONANCE-IMAGING [J].
HERZOG, RJ ;
SILLIMAN, JF ;
HUTTON, K ;
RODKEY, WG ;
STEADMAN, JR .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 1994, 22 (02) :204-210