Clinical practices in the management of new-onset, uncomplicated, low back workers' compensation disability claims

被引:41
作者
Tacci, JA
Webster, BS
Hashemi, L
Christiani, DC
机构
[1] Liberty Mutual Res Ctr Safety & Hlth, Hopkinton, MA 01748 USA
[2] Harvard Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Environm Hlth, Occupat Hlth Program, Boston, MA 02115 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1097/00043764-199905000-00008
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 [公共卫生与预防医学]; 120402 [社会医学与卫生事业管理];
摘要
Recent consensus guidelines delineate what appears to the the most successful and cost-effective management of low back pain (LBP) and some recent studies have suggested that better outcomes occur with the least aggressive forms of medical intervention. The purpose of this study was to describe how practitioners manage new-onset, uncomplicated low baa workers' compensation (WC) disability cases. A sample of cases was randomly selected from a large insurance carrier's national data source. An effort was made to select only uncomplicated cases, which would be expected to have relatively minimal need for medical intervention. There was an apparent overuse of diagnostic and treatment modalities. Diagnostic imaging was overutilized, not only in terms of the number of studies done (65% had plain films, 22% had magnetic resonance imaging scans) but also in the time frame in which they were performed (38% had plain films on the first clinic visit). Ninety percent received at least one medication, and 38% received more than one prescription for opioid analgesics. Expensive non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs were prescribed more often than acetaminophen (61% versus 6%, respectively). Sixty-two percent received physical therapy that often included modalities with as yet unproven efficacy. Overutilization of either diagnostic or treatment procedures increases the likelihood of iatrogenic complications, is not cost-effective, and may adversely impact clinical and occupational outcomes.
引用
收藏
页码:397 / 404
页数:8
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]
*AM COLL OCC ENV M, 1997, OCC MED PRACT GUID E
[2]
*AM MED ASS, 1991, PHYSICIANS CURRENT P
[3]
[Anonymous], ACTA ORTHOP SCAND
[4]
BIGOS S, 1994, CLIN PRACTICE GUIDEL, V14
[5]
IMPACT OF A MEDICAL BACK CARE PROGRAM ON UTILIZATION OF SERVICES AND PRIMARY-CARE PHYSICIAN SATISFACTION IN A LARGE, MULTISPECIALTY GROUP-PRACTICE HEALTH MAINTENANCE ORGANIZATION [J].
BRANTHAVER, B ;
STEIN, GF ;
MEHRAN, A .
SPINE, 1995, 20 (10) :1165-1169
[6]
THE OUTCOMES AND COSTS OF CARE FOR ACUTE LOW-BACK-PAIN AMONG PATIENTS SEEN BY PRIMARY-CARE PRACTITIONERS, CHIROPRACTORS, AND ORTHOPEDIC SURGEONS [J].
CAREY, TS ;
GARRETT, J ;
JACKMAN, A ;
MCLAUGHLIN, C ;
FRYER, J ;
SMUCKER, DR ;
CURTIS, P ;
DARTER, J ;
DEFRIESE, G ;
EVANS, A ;
HADLER, N ;
HUNTER, G ;
JOINES, J ;
KALSBEEK, W ;
KONRAD, T ;
MCNUTT, R ;
RICKETTS, T ;
TAYLOR, D .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1995, 333 (14) :913-917
[7]
Medication use for low back pain in primary care [J].
Cherkin, DC ;
Wheeler, KJ ;
Barlow, W ;
Deyo, RA .
SPINE, 1998, 23 (05) :607-614
[8]
DEYO RA, 1994, SPINE, V19, pS2083
[9]
COST, CONTROVERSY, CRISIS - LOW-BACK-PAIN AND THE HEALTH OF THE PUBLIC [J].
DEYO, RA ;
CHERKIN, D ;
CONRAD, D ;
VOLINN, E .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 1991, 12 :141-156
[10]
EhrmannFeldman D, 1996, PHYS THER, V76, P150, DOI 10.1093/ptj/76.2.150