Detection of trichinellosis in pigs by artificial digestion and enzyme immunoassay

被引:93
作者
Gamble, HR
机构
[1] U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Parasite Biol. and Epidemiol. Lab., Beltsville
关键词
trichinellosis; pigs; artificial digestion; serology; EIA;
D O I
10.4315/0362-028X-59.3.295
中图分类号
Q81 [生物工程学(生物技术)]; Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 0836 ; 090102 ; 100705 ;
摘要
The objective of this study was to demonstrate the reliability of current and proposed methods for the inspection of swine and other species for infection with the parasite Trichinella spiralis. Five groups of pigs were infected with doses of 2500, 500, 100, 50, and 20 T. spiralis larvae to establish moderate and low-level infections. Pigs were bled periodically during the study for samples to be tested by enzyme immunoassay (EIA). At the conclusion of the study, pigs were slaughtered and tissues collected for analyses of worm burdens and for comparison of digestion testing methods. Comparisons of pooled sample digestion methods were made using inspection methods prescribed by European Union Directives and the USDA, Code of Federal Regulations. Pooled sample digestion testing using 1-g samples was effective for detecting pigs with larval densities of >10 larvae per gram (LPG) of tissue but only partially effective for pigs with infections of <3 LPG. Pooled sample digestion testing using 5-g samples detected all pigs with infection levels >1 LPG. The ELA detected all T. spiralis-infected pigs, but did not detect infections in some pigs until 49 days after inoculation. These results demonstrate that the pooled sample digestion method using a 5-g sample size is the most effective inspection method for reducing the risk of human exposure to T. spiralis in pork.
引用
收藏
页码:295 / 298
页数:4
相关论文
共 11 条
[1]  
GAMBLE HR, 1989, TRICHINELLOSIS, P202
[2]   EVALUATION OF EXCRETORY SECRETORY ANTIGENS FOR THE SERODIAGNOSIS OF SWINE TRICHINELLOSIS [J].
GAMBLE, HR ;
RAPIC, D ;
MARINCULIC, A ;
MURRELL, KD .
VETERINARY PARASITOLOGY, 1988, 30 (02) :131-137
[3]  
GAMBLE HR, 1986, AM J VET RES, V47, P2396
[4]  
KOTULA AW, 1989, J FOOD PROTECT, V51, P691
[5]  
MURRELL KD, 1994, PROGR CLIN PARASITOL, P117
[6]   COMPARISON OF 3 METHODS FOR DETECTION OF PROLONGED EXPERIMENTAL TRICHINELLOSIS IN PIGS [J].
VANKNAPEN, F ;
FRANCHIMONT, JH ;
RUITENBERG, EJ ;
ANDRE, P ;
BALDELLI, B ;
GIBSON, TE ;
HENRIKSEN, SA ;
KOHLER, G ;
RONEUS, O ;
SKOVGAARD, N ;
SOULE, C ;
STRICKLAND, KL ;
TAYLOR, SM ;
THOMSEN, DU ;
WOLFF, F .
VETERINARY PARASITOLOGY, 1984, 16 (1-2) :167-171
[7]   COMPARISON OF 4 METHODS FOR EARLY DETECTION OF EXPERIMENTAL TRICHINELLA-SPIRALIS INFECTIONS IN PIGS [J].
VANKNAPEN, F ;
FRANCHIMONT, JH ;
RUITENBERG, EJ ;
ANDRE, P ;
BALDELLI, B ;
GIBSON, TE ;
GOTTAL, C ;
HENRIKSEN, SA ;
KOHLER, G ;
RONEUS, O ;
SKOVGAARD, N ;
SOULE, C ;
STRICKLAND, KL ;
TAYLOR, SM .
VETERINARY PARASITOLOGY, 1981, 9 (02) :117-123
[8]  
1990, ANIMALS ANIMAL PRODU, P212
[9]  
1984, OFF J EUR COMM, V167, P34
[10]  
1988, MEAT BUYERS GUIDE, P115