Comparison between multiple behavioral effects of peripheral ethanol administration in rats: Sedation, ataxia, and bradykinesia

Although low doses of systemic ethanol stimulate locomotion in mice, in rats the typical response to peripheral ethanol administration is a dose-dependent suppression of motor activity. In the present study, male rats received acute doses of ethanol IP (0.0, 0.25, 0.5, 1.0 or 2.0 g/kg) and were tested on several behavioral tasks related to the motor suppressive or sedative effects of the drug. This research design allowed for comparisons between the effects of ethanol on different behavioral tasks in order to determine which tasks were most sensitive to the drug (i.e., which tasks would yield deficits that appear at lower doses). lit the first two experiments, rats were evaluated on a sedation rating scale, and ataxia/ motor incoordination was assessed using the rotarod apparatus. Administration of 2.0 g/kg ethanol produced sedation as measured by the sedation scale, and also impaired performance on the rotarod. In a third experiment, ethanol reduced locomotion in the stabilimeter at several doses and times after IP injection, with 0.25 g/kg being the lowest dose that produced a significant decrease in locomotion. Finally, experiment four studied the effects of ethanol on operant lever pressing reinforced on a fixed ratio 5 (FR5) schedule for food reinforcement. Data showed suppressive effects on lever pressing at doses of 1.0, and 2.0 g/kg ethanol. Analysis of the interresponse time distribution showed that ethanol produced a modest slowing of operant responding, as well as fragmentation of the temporal pattern of responding and increases in pausing. Taken together, these results indicate that rats can demonstrate reduced locomotion and slowing of operant responding at doses lower than those that result in sedation or ataxia as measured by the rotarod. The detection of subtle changes in different motor test across a broad range of ethanol doses is important for understanding ethanol effects in other cognitive, motivational or sensory processes. (c) 2006 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.