Physicians' Experiences With BRCA1/2 Testing in Community Settings

被引:30
作者
Keating, Nancy L. [1 ]
Stoeckert, Kathryn A.
Regan, Meredith M.
DiGianni, Lisa
Garber, Judy E.
机构
[1] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Dept Hlth Care Policy, Boston, MA 02115 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1200/JCO.2008.17.8053
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose We surveyed a national sample of nonacademic physicians who ordered BRCA1/2 testing to understand their implementation of genetic testing and to assess recommendations for surveillance and cancer risk management of women with positive test results. Patients and Methods We surveyed physicians (N = 611 of 1,050; response rate, 58.2%) practicing in nonacademic settings who ordered BRCA1/2 testing during 2004 to 2005. We described physicians' experiences with testing and used multivariable regression models to identify factors associated with more complete counseling and with recommendations for cancer risk management for a BRCA1 mutation carrier. Results Most physicians (68.2%) usually or always discussed six counseling items before testing. In adjusted analyses, physicians who were assisted by genetic counselors, nurse geneticists, or others (v counseling by themselves), those who spent more than 60 minutes in counseling, and medical oncologists (v surgeons or geneticists) were more likely to discuss all six items (all P < .05). A total of 61.4% of physicians would recommend bilateral prophylactic mastectomy to a 38-year-old BRCA1 mutation carrier who had completed childbearing. After adjustment, geneticists and gynecologists were less likely than medical oncologists and surgeons to recommend prophylactic mastectomy (P < .001), as were physicians in the Northeast versus those in other regions of the United States (P < .01). Conclusion Community-based physicians seem to be successfully incorporating BRCA1/2 testing into their practices. Physicians' recommendations for surveillance of mutation carriers are generally consistent with practice guidelines, yet recommendations for preference-based procedures such as prophylactic mastectomy vary by physician characteristics such as specialty and geographic region. The providers whom patients see for testing may contribute to variations in prophylactic treatments.
引用
收藏
页码:5789 / 5796
页数:8
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]  
*AM COLL MED GEN, POL STAT GEN SUSC BR
[2]   Life insurance and breast cancer risk assessment: Adverse selection, genetic testing decisions, and discrimination [J].
Armstrong, K ;
Weber, B ;
FitzGerald, G ;
Hershey, JC ;
Pauly, MV ;
Lemaire, J ;
Subramanian, K ;
Asch, DA .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL GENETICS PART A, 2003, 120A (03) :359-364
[3]   Hormone replacement therapy and life expectancy after prophylactic oophorectomy in women with BRCA1/2 mutations:: A decision analysis [J].
Armstrong, K ;
Schwartz, JS ;
Randall, T ;
Rubin, SC ;
Weber, B .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2004, 22 (06) :1045-1054
[4]  
BERNHARDT BA, 2000, ONCOL NURS FORUM, V39, P27
[5]   American Society of Clinical Oncology policy statement update: Genetic testing for cancer susceptibility [J].
Bruinooge, SS .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2003, 21 (12) :2397-2406
[6]   Recommendations for follow-up care of individuals with an inherited predisposition to cancer .2. BRCA1 and BRCA2 [J].
Burke, W ;
Daly, M ;
Garber, J ;
Botkin, J ;
Kahn, MJE ;
Lynch, P ;
McTierman, A ;
Offit, K ;
Perlman, J ;
Petersen, G ;
Thomson, E ;
Varricchio, C .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1997, 277 (12) :997-1003
[7]   BRCA1/2 genetic testing in the community setting [J].
Chen, WY ;
Garber, JE ;
Higham, S ;
Schneider, KA ;
Davis, KB ;
Deffenbaugh, AM ;
Frank, TS ;
Gelman, RS ;
Li, FP .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2002, 20 (22) :4485-4492
[8]  
Daly M, 1999, ONCOLOGY-NY, V13, P161
[9]   US physicians' attitudes toward genetic testing for cancer susceptibility [J].
Freedman, AN ;
Wideroff, L ;
Olson, L ;
Davis, W ;
Klabunde, C ;
Srinath, KP ;
Reeve, BB ;
Croyle, RT ;
Ballard-Barbash, R .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL GENETICS PART A, 2003, 120A (01) :63-71
[10]  
Garber JE, 2004, J CLIN ONCOL, V22, P978, DOI 10.1200/JCO.2004.01.926